弗吉尼亚州县就4月重新划区投票的时间规则提出挑战 | 福克斯新闻


作者:查尔斯·克里茨 | 福克斯新闻
发布时间:2026年3月9日 美国东部时间下午12:17

弗吉尼亚州县及几个独立城市正抵制4月的特别选举,这场选举可能在选民下次投票前重塑该州几乎所有共和党人掌控的国会选区。

若获通过,公投将触发该州国会选区的中期重新划界,可能改变弗吉尼亚州美国众议院代表团的权力平衡。若被否决,现有选区地图将维持不变,而围绕该措施的持续法律挑战可能会变得无意义。

以“不自由,毋宁死”的帕特里克·亨利命名的帕特里克县,当地官员已在全州立法者和律师的支持下,对此次投票发起早期正式挑战。该县通过决议将提前投票推迟至4月21日选举前几天,因为重新划区修正案仍在塔泽韦尔县法院接受审理。

帕特里克县及其他地区认为,《弗吉尼亚宪法》要求在投票措施开始提前投票前至少有90天的时间。他们声称民主党人不当利用了2024年从未正式结束的特别立法会议,将重新划区修正案快速纳入11月的投票中。

新民主党新星在“温和派”竞选后迅速左转,回应特朗普的争议回应:议员

在帕特里克县的带头下,坎贝尔、夏洛特、斯波茨维尔、乔治王子、斯科特、华盛顿、弗洛伊德和罗阿诺克县的官员,以及独立城市林奇堡,正在考虑、推进或就类似措施进行投票。代表这些地区的德尔·雷恩·威廉姆斯(同时也是律师)在接受福克斯新闻数字频道采访时表示,他在政治和法律层面都高度关注此事。

威廉姆斯代表弗吉尼亚州西南部深红山区的帕特里克、弗洛伊德和卡罗尔县以及独立城市加拉克斯,他称从非政治角度看,这些决议归结为财政责任问题。

“谁会投票反对‘恢复公平’?我认为这是民主党人越界和操之过急的地方。当我还是个年轻律师时,一位年长的律师曾告诉我,猪养肥了会被宰杀。”他在独家采访中表示。

他说,帕特里克县将花费约15,000美元举行特别选举,而里士满持续的法律不确定性和政治博弈不会为市政当局花费此类资源创造稳定环境。

塔泽韦尔县法官小杰克·赫尔利支持参议院少数党领袖、汉诺威共和党人瑞安·麦克杜格尔的程序性挑战,宣布重新划区修正案“自始无效”(ab initio)。

联邦政府提起上诉,弗吉尼亚州最高法院裁定公投可以继续进行,同时等待案件审查。此外,共和党全国委员会(RNC)再次通过塔泽韦尔起诉弗吉尼亚州选举部,赫尔利再次以弗吉尼亚民主党在投票问题中使用“[投票支持]恢复公平”的误导性语言为由阻止选举。

共和党全国委员会起诉阻止民主党在弗吉尼亚的重新划区推进

参议院议长路易斯·卢卡斯(D-朴茨茅斯)多次声称自己支持公投,并以粗俗方式回应批评者,包括对10:1民主党倾向的新地图表示不满的德克萨斯州参议员泰德·克鲁兹。

“是你们先挑起的,我们就用了它。”卢卡斯回应克鲁兹称此举滥用权力、冒犯民主时表示。

威廉姆斯表示,从财政和法律角度看,考虑到上述所有情况,像他所在的地区这样的县是站在有理的一方。

弗吉尼亚海滩律师蒂姆·安德森(前州议员)曾公开支持这一努力,直到上周末州最高法院在法律上设置障碍。

安德森在社交媒体上发布了大量视频评论和文件,包括供各县使用的决议草案。

围绕哈里森堡的罗金厄姆县上周提出了类似的决议,官员称“国会选区重新划界对社区选举了解并熟悉其价值观、优先事项和区域需求的代表的能力有重大影响。”

然而,据报道,林奇堡一名法官裁定他无法干预选举进程,因为选举齿轮已启动。安德森代表林奇堡官员向《弗吉尼亚卡迪纳尔新闻》表示,他不会上诉,并转而建议所有关键县推进选举。

周四,安德森在视频中警告,鉴于新裁决,所有县必须遵守最高法院的决定。

“如果你是地方官员……在通过决议称不进行选举的管辖区内,必须立即逆转。弗吉尼亚最高法院已作出裁决,你们必须遵守。”

“去提前投票吧,除此之外别无他法。如果我们输了,之后可以提出大量法律论点。”安德森补充道,暗示他将再次参与任何事后诉讼。

短短几天内,要求弗吉尼亚州民众投票“反对”的庭院标语已出现在阿默斯特、斯蒂芬森、比尤纳维斯塔等地及周边。

代表弗吉尼亚州从罗阿诺克西弗吉尼亚州边界到罗阿诺克以北的博泰尔县的本·克莱恩议员,在评论中表达了支持者的担忧。

克莱恩称他目前的选区将被分割成五块,其中许多块将来自文化差异大的阿灵顿,这剥夺了弗吉尼亚顶级农业区在华盛顿的单一声音。

周三,弗吉尼亚州最高法院暂停了赫尔利关于选举继续进行的裁决,并表示将允许选举进行,但明确表示不会就案件是非曲直作出裁决,称其将在选举后几天进行审查。

“我们最终可能需要解决的是这个努力的过程,而非结果。发布禁令阻止弗吉尼亚人投票不是做出这一决定的正确方式。”最高法院在裁决中表示。

周五提前投票开始后,弗吉尼亚州总检察长杰伊·琼斯发表法律意见反对各县的努力。

重新划区之争爆发,马里兰州民主党试图重新划定唯一共和党人席位

“地方政府不能用自己独立的宪法解释来干涉国家规定的选举。”琼斯在《斯坦顿新闻领袖报》中表示。

琼斯声称,各县无权阻止“选举官员履行法定职责”,并强调州至上原则,称任何干扰性决议“没有法律效力”。

在琼斯发表意见之前,威廉姆斯告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,他理解其中的“法律战”,称他过去处理过选举诉讼,并指出法院以“捉我你就赢”的方式拒绝或拖延裁决,直到情况变得无意义,使他们不必实际发布最终判决。

“如果[重新划区修正案]通过,他们会说‘多数人已表明立场’。这就是我的担忧……”

点击此处下载福克斯新闻应用

展望未来,威廉姆斯指出,许多关键县将在未来几天召开下一次委员会会议,并暗示这场斗争可能尚未结束。

一名共和党消息人士告诉福克斯新闻数字频道,民主党人“押上了全部赌注”在重新划区修正案上,如果通知要求被驳回,他们的另外三项修正案(包括地图重绘)也将失败。

查尔斯·克里茨是福克斯新闻数字频道记者。2013年加入福克斯新闻,担任撰稿人和制作助理。他负责报道媒体、政治和文化新闻。查尔斯是宾夕法尼亚州人,毕业于天普大学广播新闻学士学位。新闻线索可发送至 charles.creitz@fox.com。

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390083836112
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6386444352112
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6388053301112

Virginia counties challenge April redistricting vote over timing rules | Fox News

By Charles Creitz | Fox News
Published March 9, 2026 12:17pm EDT

Virginia counties and several independent cities are pushing back against an April special election that could reshape nearly every Republican-held congressional district in the state before voters next head to the polls.

If approved, the referendum would trigger a mid-cycle redrawing of the state’s congressional map, potentially altering the balance of power in Virginia’s U.S. House delegation. If rejected, the existing map would remain in place and ongoing legal challenges surrounding the measure could be rendered moot.

In Patrick County — named for “Give me liberty or give me death,” Gov. Patrick Henry — local officials have mounted an early formal challenge to the vote, backed by lawmakers and attorneys from across the state. The county passed a resolution delaying early voting until just days before the April 21 election, as the redistricting amendment continues to be tested in court in Tazewell County.

Patrick County and others argue that the Virginia Constitution requires at least 90 days to pass before early voting can begin on a ballot measure. They claim Democrats improperly used a 2024 special legislative session — which was never formally closed — to fast-track the redistricting amendment onto the November ballot.

NEW DEM STAR’S QUICK HARD-LEFT TURN AFTER ‘MODERATE’ CAMPAIGN WON HER COVETED RESPONSE TO TRUMP: LAWMAKER

Following Patrick’s lead, officials in Campbell, Charlotte, Spotsylvania, Prince George, Scott, Washington, Floyd and Roanoke counties, along with the independent city of Lynchburg, are considering, pursuing or voting on similar measures, according to Del. Wren Williams, who is also an attorney and who told Fox News Digital he is both politically and legally laser-focused on the situation.

Williams, who represents Patrick, Floyd and Carroll counties and the independent city of Galax in Virginia’s deep-red, mountainous southwest, said that from an apolitical perspective, the resolutions boil down to fiscal responsibility.

“Who would vote against ‘restoring fairness’? That is where I think [Democrats] have overstepped and overplayed their hand. When I was a young attorney, an older attorney told me one time, pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered,” he said in an exclusive interview.

Patrick County will spend about $15,000 to hold a special election, and the ongoing legal uncertainty and political gamesmanship over the issue in Richmond do not create a stable environment for municipalities to expend such resources, he said.

Tazewell County Judge Jack Hurley Jr. ruled in favor of Senate Minority Leader Ryan McDougle, R-Hanover, in the GOP’s procedural challenge, declaring the redistricting amendment “void ab initio,” or invalid from the start.

The commonwealth appealed, and the Virginia Supreme Court ruled the referendum could stand while it reviews the case. Separately, the RNC has sued the Virginia Department of Elections again via Tazewell, and Hurley again blocked the election on grounds that Virginia Democrats’ ballot question language of “[vote yes to] restore fairness” is misleading.

RNC SUES TO STOP DEMOCRATS’ VIRGINIA REDISTRICTING PUSH

Senate President L. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth, has repeatedly claimed the referendum’s mantle, responding in often profane ways to critics, including Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who took issue with the 10-1 Democratic bent of the new map.

“You all started it and we f[—]ing finished it,” Lucas said in response to Cruz calling it an abuse of power and affront to democracy.

Williams said that from both a fiscal and legal perspective, with all of the above going on, counties like his own are in the right.

The effort was publicly backed by Virginia Beach attorney Tim Anderson, a former state legislator, until the state Supreme Court threw a legal wrench in the works late last week.

Anderson has posted numerous video comments and documents on his social media, including a draft resolution for counties to use.

Rockingham County, which surrounds Harrisonburg, put forward a similarly crafted resolution last week wherein officials stated, “congressional redistricting has significant consequences for the ability of communities to elect representatives who understand and are familiar with their values, priorities and regional needs.”

However, after a Lynchburg judge reportedly ruled he could not intervene in the election process because the gears were already in motion, Anderson, who represented Lynchburg officials, told the Virginia Cardinal News he is not appealing and has pivoted to suggesting all critical counties move forward with the election.

In a video message on Thursday, Anderson warned that given the new ruling, all counties must now follow the Supreme Court.

THIS CRUCIAL STATE IS THE LATEST BATTLEGROUND IN REDISTRICTING WAR BETWEEN TRUMP AND DEMOCRATS

“If you are a local official… in a jurisdiction that entered a resolution that said you’re not going to do the elections, you need to reverse immediately. The Virginia Supreme Court has made its decision, you are bound by it,” he said.

“Go early vote. There’s nothing else to do other than to vote. If we lose, there are a ton of legal arguments that can be made [then],” Anderson added, further suggesting he will again be a part of any postmortem arguments.

Over just a few days, yards signs pleading with fellow Virginians to vote “NO” have cropped up all around, in places like Amherst, Stephenson, Buena Vista and beyond.

Rep. Ben Cline, R-Va., whose district runs from the West Virginia line at Roanoke to Botetourt County north of Roanoke, echoed those proponents’ concerns in comments to Fox News Digital.

Cline said his current district would be split into five pieces, many of which would originate in culturally disparate Arlington, saying it strips the singular voice in Washington from Virginia’s top agricultural region.

Another wrinkle was thrown in Wednesday when the Virginia Supreme Court stayed Hurley’s ruling regarding the election moving forward and said it will allow it to proceed while making clear it is not issuing a ruling on the merits of the case, which it maintains will come a few days after the election, according to the Virginia Scope.

“It is the process, not the outcome, of this effort that we may ultimately have to address. Issuing an injunction to keep Virginians from the polls is not the proper way to make this decision,” the court ruled, according to the Scope.

As early voting began Friday, Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones issued a legal opinion opposing the counties’ efforts.

REDISTRICTING FIGHT ERUPTS AS MARYLAND DEMOCRATS MOVE TO REDRAW LONE GOP HOUSE SEAT

“Local governing bodies cannot use their own independent constitutional interpretations to justify interfering with state-mandated elections,” Jones said, according to the Staunton News-Leader.

Jones claimed the counties don’t have any authority to prevent “election officials from performing their statutory duties,” alleging state supremacy and arguing that any disruptive resolutions would have “no legal effect.”

Prior to Jones’ opinion, Williams told Fox News Digital he understands the “lawfare” at play, saying he’s worked with election-law suits in the past and spoke of a “catch-me-if-you-can” dynamic of courts denying or delaying decisions until the situation is mooted so that they don’t actually have to issue a final ruling.

“If [the redistricting amendment] passes, they’re going to say, ‘the majority has spoken.’ And so that is my concern…” he said.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Looking ahead, Williams noted many of the critical counties are holding their next board meetings in the coming days, and suggested the fight may not be over just yet.

A Republican source told Fox News Digital that Democrats “bet the farm” on the redistricting amendment and that “if it fails on the notice requirement, so do their other three amendments,” including the map redraw.

Charles Creitz is a reporter for Fox News Digital.

He joined Fox News in 2013 as a writer and production assistant.

Charles covers media, politics and culture for Fox News Digital.

Charles is a Pennsylvania native and graduated from Temple University with a B.A. in Broadcast Journalism. Story tips can be sent to charles.creitz@fox.com.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6390083836112
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6386444352112
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6388053301112

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注