特朗普政府司法部试图限制针对其律师的道德调查


2026年3月4日 下午6:41 UTC / 安德鲁·古兹沃德报道

华盛顿,3月4日(路透社) – 据周三提交的一项拟议规则显示,美国司法部正试图限制各州对其律师所谓不当行为展开的道德调查。该规则将保护那些为特朗普总统议程服务的检察官。

该提案将赋予美国司法部长审查针对现任或前任司法部律师的不当行为指控的权力,并要求各州层面的纪律机构暂停此类调查。

图片说明: 美国司法部长帕姆·邦迪于2026年2月11日在华盛顿特区国会山出席众议院司法委员会关于司法部监督情况的听证会。路透社/肯特·西村/资料图片

通过拖延此类审查,司法部长可能会拖延任何此类调查。

该提案针对的是律师协会和类似专业组织(而非政府实体)的行为,这些组织调查律师所谓的不道德行为,并考虑诸如吊销律师执照等处罚措施。

例如,华盛顿的一个律师道德小组去年建议,特朗普第一任期内的司法部高级官员杰弗里·克拉克因不诚实行为应被吊销律师执照。

克拉克曾试图促使司法部参与特朗普基于虚假的大规模选民欺诈指控推翻其2020年选举失利的失败尝试。克拉克否认有不当行为。哥伦比亚特区上诉法院将对吊销执照的决定做出最终裁决。

根据新提案,在司法部长审查完成之前,现任或前任司法部律师不得协助州级调查。

特朗普任命的司法部长帕姆·邦迪已签署该规则草案,该草案将于周四开始接受为期30天的公众意见征询,之后才能生效。

自特朗普去年重返总统职位以来,数名现任和前任司法部律师因相关行为面临外部团体的道德投诉,其中包括该部门的特赦律师埃德·马丁,以及曾对特朗普对手詹姆斯·科米和莱蒂西亚·詹姆斯提起刑事诉讼(后被法院驳回)的前检察官林赛·哈利根。

司法部官员批评针对特朗普盟友的州级纪律调查。

“我们将尽一切努力将这些‘激进律师协会’排除在调查之外,”特朗普的前私人律师、司法部副部长托德·布兰奇在11月由联邦党人协会保守法律组织举办的会议上表示。

该规则提案称,律师协会调查是“将政府武器化以针对特朗普及其盟友”的一部分,且可能“抑制部门律师代表美国、其机构及其官员进行的积极辩护”。

该规则提案不会赋予司法部完全终止州律师协会纪律调查的权力。根据该提案,州律师协会当局不必服从司法部内部调查结果。

美国所有州均有禁止利益冲突、不诚实或其他职业违规行为的律师职业道德规则。

安德鲁·古兹沃德报道;大卫·巴里奥和威尔·邓纳姆编辑

Trump Justice Department aims to limit ethics probes into its lawyers

March 4, 2026 6:41 PM UTC / By Andrew Goudsward

WASHINGTON, March 4 (Reuters) – The U.S. Justice Department is seeking to constrain ethics investigations ​conducted at the state level into alleged misconduct by its lawyers, according to a proposed rule ‌submitted on Wednesday that would shield prosecutors pursuing President Donald Trump’s agenda.

The proposal would give the U.S. attorney general the right to review misconduct allegations against current or former Justice Department attorneys and request that disciplinary authorities at the state level suspend their investigations.

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi testifies before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on oversight of the Justice Department, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 11, 2026. REUTERS/Kent Nishimura/File Photo

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

That would mean that ​the attorney general, by dragging out such a review, could stall any such investigation.

The proposal takes aim ​at the actions of bar associations and similar professional organizations, not government entities, that investigate alleged ⁠unethical conduct by lawyers and consider actions such as disbarment, which involves revoking a license to practice law.

For instance, ​an attorney ethics panel in Washington recommended last year that Jeffrey Clark, a senior Justice Department official during Trump’s first term ​as president, be disbarred for conduct involving dishonesty.

Clark sought to enlist the Justice Department in Trump’s failed attempts to overturn his 2020 election loss based on false claims of widespread voter fraud. Clark has denied wrongdoing. A District of Columbia appeals court will make the ​final determination on disbarment.

Under the new proposal, current or former Justice Department lawyers would be prohibited from assisting state-level investigations ​until the attorney general’s review is finished.

Attorney General Pam Bondi, a Trump appointee, already has signed the draft rule, which will be ‌open ⁠for public comment for 30 days starting on Thursday before it can go into effect.

Several current and former Justice Department lawyers are facing ethics complaints from outside groups for actions taken since Trump returned to the presidency last year. They include Ed Martin, the department’s pardon attorney, and Lindsey Halligan, a former prosecutor who brought criminal charges – later thrown out of court – ​against Trump adversaries James Comey ​and Letitia James.

Justice Department officials ⁠have criticized state-level disciplinary investigations targeting Trump allies.

“We’re going to do everything we can to take these activist bars out of the picture,” Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, a former personal ​lawyer for Trump, said during a November conference run by the Federalist Society conservative ​legal group.

The proposed ⁠rule alleges that bar investigations are part of an effort to weaponize government against Trump and his allies, and risk “chilling the zealous advocacy by department attorneys on behalf of the United States, its agencies and its officers.”

The proposed rule would not ⁠give the ​Justice Department the authority to outright end a state bar disciplinary investigation. ​State bar authorities do not have to defer to Justice Department internal findings under the proposal.

All U.S. states maintain attorney ethics rules that prohibit misconduct ​such as conflicts of interest, dishonesty or other professional breaches.

Reporting by Andrew Goudsward; Editing by David Bario and Will Dunham

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注