报告发现:关税退款延迟每月或使美国纳税人损失7亿美元利息


3月4日,2026年 / 美国东部时间下午2:10 / CBS新闻

联邦政府在上个月最高法院推翻特朗普政府大部分进口关税后,预计欠美国企业高达1750亿美元的关税退款。但根据一项新分析,美国最终可能要偿还更多资金——即利息支付。

华盛顿特区无党派智库卡托研究所的研究表明,由于最高法院宣布无效的紧急关税退款延迟,美国进口商每月因非法征收关税产生的利息总损失达7亿美元,即每天2300万美元。

“如果你进口商品并缴纳了政府认定为错误的关税,你会连本带利拿回钱,因为这笔资金被占用了,”卡托研究所宏观经济学副总裁斯科特·林西科姆在接受CBS新闻采访时表示。

特朗普政府曾表示,如果最高法院认定针对全球几乎所有美国贸易伙伴的关税为非法,将发放退款。

白宫未立即回应卡托研究所调查结果的置评请求。

退款障碍消除


美国联邦巡回上诉法院周一驳回了特朗普政府要求推迟退款流程的请求。这一裁决为美国国际贸易法院建立补偿流程铺平了道路,以偿还成功挑战特朗普全球关税的小企业。

卡托研究所基于宾夕法尼亚大学佩恩·沃顿预算模型等机构的估计,假设美国在2月份征收的1750亿美元关税被撤销,计算出政府额外利息支付总额。

美国海关与边境保护局数据显示,截至2025年底,联邦政府根据《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA)已征收1340亿美元关税。

卡托研究所报告指出:“延迟提供关税退款将使美国纳税人除关税退款外,还要承担数十亿美元的利息——而政府在多次公开文件中已承认并承诺支付这些利息。”

需支付利息


根据美国海关规定,必须对关税多缴部分支付利息,《联邦法规法典》明确政府需为可退还关税支付利息。美国国税局(IRS)的企业多缴利率规定了退款利息率。

根据现行美国贸易法,价值低于1万美元的进口商品税率为6%,超过1万美元的大宗商品税率为4.5%。卡托研究所估算,按这些利率,延迟退款一年可能导致非法IEEPA关税产生84亿美元额外利息。

“我不知道政府会如何争辩,但法律规定——法院也明确——他们必须支付带利息的退款,”林西科姆说。

包括博士伦、戴森、联邦快递和欧莱雅在内的多家大型企业已起诉联邦政府,要求退还根据IEEPA支付的关税。联邦快递还承诺,如果公司最终能全额收回损失,将退还托运人和消费者支付的费用。

编辑:Alain Sherter

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/what-to-know-about-potential-tariff-refunds-after-last-weeks-supreme-court-ruling/

Tariff refund delays could cost U.S. taxpayers $700 million a month in interest, report finds

March 4, 2026 / 2:10 PM EST / CBS News

The federal government is estimated to owe American businesses up to $175 billion in tariff refunds after the Supreme Court struck down much of the Trump administration’s import duties last month. But the U.S. could end up owing considerably more money, according to a new analysis — in interest payments.

Research from the Cato Institute, a nonpartisan think tank in Washington, D.C., said that the delay in refunding companies for emergency tariffs invalidated by the high court is costing U.S. importers a total of $700 million per month, or $23 million per day, based on the interest owed on the illegally collected duties.

“If you import a good and pay a duty on it that the government assesses was wrong, you get your money back with interest, because that capital was tied up,” Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the Cato Institute, told CBS News.

The Trump administration had said it would issue refunds if the duties targeting nearly every U.S. trading partner around the world were found unlawful by the Supreme Court.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Cato’s findings.

Refund barrier removed


The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Monday denied the Trump administration’s request to delay the refund process. The decision opens the door for the U.S. Court of International Trade to set up a process to reimburse the small businesses that successfully challenged Mr. Trump’s global tariffs.

Cato’s calculation of how much the government owes in additional interest payments assumes the U.S. had collected $175 billion in tariffs when they were struck down in February, basing that figure on estimates from the Penn Wharton Budget Model at the University of Pennsylvania and other sources.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection data shows that, through the end of 2025, the federal government had collected $134 billion in duties under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

Delays in providing tariff refunds “would leave American taxpayers on the hook for billions in interest that the government would owe importers on top of the tariff refunds — interest that the government has already acknowledged in multiple public filings and has promised to pay,” Cato said in its report.

Interest payments required


Interest payments on tariff overpayments are required under U.S. customs rules, with the Code of Federal Regulations stating that the government must pay interest on reimbursable duties. The IRS’ corporate overpayment rates establish interest rates on refunds.

Under current U.S. trade laws, the tax rate on imports worth less than $10,000 is 6% and 4.5% for larger volumes of goods worth more than $10,000. Based on those rates, delaying refunds for one year could result in additional interest payments on the illegal IEEPA tariffs of $8.4 billion, according to Cato.

“I don’t know what the administration will argue, but the law says — and courts have been clear — that they are going to require refunds with interest,” Lincicome said.

Several major corporations, including Bausch & Lomb, Dyson, FedEx and L’Oreal, have sued the federal government for refunds on the tariffs they paid under IEEPA. FedEx has also pledged to refund shippers and consumers who paid the charges if the business is ultimately made whole.

Edited by Alain Sherter

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/what-to-know-about-potential-tariff-refunds-after-last-weeks-supreme-court-ruling/

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注