如果哈梅内伊倒台,谁将掌控伊朗?袭击将暴露权力真空——以及伊斯兰革命卫队的控制


据报道,袭击目标包括最高领袖阿里·哈梅内伊阿亚图拉和总统马苏德·佩泽什基安,分析师称目前尚无明显的继任者

作者:摩根·菲利普斯、埃弗拉特·拉赫特
福克斯新闻

2026年2月28日美国东部时间上午8:57发布

随着美国和以色列军队深入伊朗境内发动袭击——据报道目标是包括最高领袖阿里·哈梅内伊阿亚图拉和总统马苏德·佩泽什基安在内的高级政权官员——如果伊斯兰共和国垮台,谁将领导伊朗的问题已不再是理论层面。

伊朗已对中东地区的美国阵地发动导弹齐射报复,尽管伊朗官方媒体称高层领导人仍然健在并已转移至安全地点,但直接针对政治和军事领导层的行为标志着局势急剧升级。

然而,尽管局势紧张,地区分析师表示,目前没有明显的继任者准备接管该国。

真正的权力中心:安全部队

专家们一致指出一个决定性因素:伊朗的强制机构——特别是伊斯兰革命卫队(IRGC)——是分裂还是巩固。

如果伊斯兰革命卫队保持凝聚力,最可能的结果不是民主过渡,而是一个更强硬、更公开由安全部门主导的体系。即使关键人物被移除,神职人员的重组或军方领导的整合也可能保留大部分现有权力结构。

如果伊斯兰革命卫队或常规武装部队在战争和内部动荡压力下叛逃或分裂,政治开放可能出现

目前,没有确凿证据表明安全部门发生大规模叛逃。

雷扎·巴列维:知名但长期流亡海外

海外最突出的反对人物之一是伊朗末代国王的儿子雷扎·巴列维。自1979年革命以来,他一直生活在伊朗境外,数十年来一直倡导建立世俗民主制度。

在最近的声明中,巴列维称美国的袭击是”人道主义干预”,并敦促伊朗的军事和安全部队放弃神职人员政权。他宣称伊斯兰共和国正在”崩溃”,并呼吁伊朗人在适当时候准备重返街头。

但尽管巴列维在侨民中有知名度和支持者,但他在伊朗国内的实际支持基础难以衡量。他已四十多年没有在伊朗生活,许多伊朗人对君主制的遗产仍存在分歧。

分析师指出,象征性的可见度——包括过去抗议活动中听到的口号——并不一定转化为治理近9000万人口国家所需的组织基础设施。

玛丽安·拉贾维与全国抵抗委员会:组织化但存在争议

伊朗全国抵抗委员会(NCRI)领导人玛丽安·拉贾维采取了不同的策略。她的组织宣布了一个临时政府框架,旨在将主权移交给伊朗人民,并根据她长期的十点计划建立一个民主共和国。

在随后的信息中,拉贾维呼吁”武装部队中的爱国人员”与伊朗人民站在一起,并敦促政权部队”放下武器投降”。她还拒绝了神职人员统治和她所谓的”君主法西斯主义”(显然指与前王室有关的复辟运动)。

该计划呼吁解散伊斯兰革命卫队和其他安全机构,实行政教分离,废除死刑,保障性别平等,并举行制宪会议选举。

全国抵抗委员会将自己定位为现成的治理替代方案。

尽管多年来一些西方政治人物表示支持,但国内合法性仍不确定

尽管一些西方政治人物多年来表示支持,但国内合法性仍不确定。

无明确的继承人

尽管反对人物发表了大胆声明,专家警告说,伊朗未来的领导层更可能在军营和安全大院中形成,而不是在流亡者的新闻发布会上。

四十年的镇压已经削弱了内部政治替代方案。伊朗国内没有出现获得跨派系合法性的公认平民领袖。

如果政权领导层迅速垮台,直接的斗争可能会在安全精英之间展开——而不是在流亡对手之间。

目前,分析师表示,伊朗有不同的愿景但没有共识的继任者

伊朗是否向新政治体系过渡、强化为军事统治或经历长期不稳定,将更少取决于国外的声明,而更多取决于政权核心权力结构是否从内部破裂。

相关文章

特朗普告诉伊朗人”你们自由的时刻即将到来”,美国-以色列对伊朗发动袭击

…(后续内容按原文保留格式,但由于篇幅限制,此处仅展示主要翻译内容)

If Khamenei falls, who takes Iran? Strikes will expose power vacuum — and the IRGC’s grip

Strikes reportedly aim at Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian as analysts say no obvious successor exists

By Morgan Phillips, Efrat Lachter
Fox News

Published February 28, 2026 8:57am EST

As U.S. and Israeli forces strike deep inside Iran — reportedly targeting senior regime officials including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian — the question of who would lead Iran if the Islamic Republic collapses is no longer theoretical.

Iran has retaliated with missile barrages against U.S. positions across the Middle East, and while Iranian state media says top leaders remain alive and have been moved to secure locations, the direct targeting of political and military leadership marks a dramatic escalation.

Yet despite the intensity of the moment, regional analysts say there is no obvious successor poised to take control of the country.

The real power center: security forces

Experts consistently point to one determining factor: whether Iran’s coercive institutions — particularly the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — fracture or consolidate.

If the IRGC remains cohesive, the most likely outcome is not democratic transition but a harder, more openly security-dominated system. A clerical reshuffle or military-led consolidation could preserve much of the existing power structure even if key figures are removed.

As U.S. and Israeli forces strike deep inside Iran — reportedly targeting senior regime officials including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian — the question of who would lead Iran if the Islamic Republic collapses is no longer theoretical.(Iranian Leader Press Office/Anadolu via Getty Images)

If, however, segments of the IRGC or regular armed forces defect or splinter under pressure from war and internal unrest, a political opening could emerge.

At this stage, there is no confirmed evidence of widespread security defections.

Reza Pahlavi: visible but long in exile

One of the most prominent opposition figures abroad is Reza Pahlavi, son of Iran’s last shah. He has lived outside Iran since the 1979 revolution and has spent decades advocating for a secular, democratic system.

In a recent statement, Pahlavi called the U.S. strikes a “humanitarian intervention” and urged Iran’s military and security forces to abandon the clerical regime. He declared that the Islamic Republic is “collapsing” and called on Iranians to prepare to return to the streets at the appropriate time.

But while Pahlavi has name recognition and support among parts of the diaspora, his actual base of support inside Iran is difficult to measure. He has not lived in the country for more than four decades, and many Iranians remain divided over the legacy of the monarchy.

Analysts note that symbolic visibility — including chants heard during past protests — does not necessarily translate into the organizational infrastructure needed to govern a country of nearly 90 million people.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian speaks with Fox News Channel’s Martha MacCallum during an interview on September 25, 2025 in New York City.(John Lamparski/Getty Images)

Maryam Rajavi and the NCRI: organized but controversial

Maryam Rajavi, leader of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), has taken a different approach. Her organization announced a provisional government framework aimed at transferring sovereignty to the Iranian people and establishing a democratic republic based on her longstanding ten-point plan.

In a subsequent message, Rajavi called on “patriotic personnel in the armed forces” to stand with the Iranian people and urged regime forces to “lay down their arms and surrender.” She also rejected both clerical rule and what she described as “monarchical fascism,” an apparent reference to restorationist movements linked to the former royal family.

The plan calls for dissolving the IRGC and other security institutions, separating religion from the state, abolishing the death penalty, guaranteeing gender equality and holding elections for a constituent assembly.

The NCRI presents itself as a ready governing alternative.

TRUMP ADMIN RAMPS UP ‘MAXIMUM PRESSURE’ IRAN SANCTIONS AHEAD OF NEW ROUND OF NUCLEAR TALKS

But the group — closely associated with the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) — remains deeply controversial. Its history of armed struggle and years spent in exile have led many analysts to question the depth of its support inside Iran, particularly among younger generations.

Exiled Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi said the Ayatollah’s regime engages in a pattern of pretending to negotiate in earnest to buy time.(Paul Morigi/Getty Images)

While some Western political figures have expressed backing over the years, domestic legitimacy remains uncertain.

No clear heir apparent

Despite bold statements from opposition figures, experts caution that Iran’s future leadership is more likely to be shaped inside military barracks and security compounds than in exile press conferences.

Four decades of repression have hollowed out internal political alternatives. No widely recognized civilian leader inside Iran has emerged with cross-factional legitimacy.

If the regime’s leadership were to fall quickly, the immediate struggle would likely be among security elites — not between rival exile figures.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

For now, analysts say, Iran has competing visions but no consensus successor. Whether the country transitions toward a new political system, hardens into military rule or experiences prolonged instability will depend less on declarations abroad and more on whether the regime’s core power structures fracture from within.

Related Article

Trump tells Iranians the ‘hour of your freedom is at hand’ as US-Israel launch strikes against Iran

Sponsored Stories You May Like

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注