法官阻止弗吉尼亚州限制儿童使用社交媒体的法律

Judge blocks Virginia law restricting social media for children

February 27, 2026 11:03 PM UTC / Reuters

By Jonathan Stempel

节点运行失败

Item 1 of 2 Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, Facebook, Twitch and Reddit applications are displayed on a mobile phone in this picture illustration taken on December 9, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams/Illustration/File Photo

[1/2]Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, YouTube, Facebook, Twitch and Reddit applications are displayed on a mobile phone in this picture illustration taken on December 9, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams/Illustration/File Photo

• Summary
• Companies

• Judge cites First Amendment in issuing injunction
• Judge found law both overinclusive and underinclusive
• Virginia pledges to help parents protect children

Feb 27 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Friday blocked Virginia from enforcing a new law that aimed to protect children from being addicted to social media by requiring age verification and limiting use by those under 16 to one hour per day.

U.S. District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles in Alexandria, Virginia, said the technology trade group NetChoice was likely to establish that the law unconstitutionally infringed the free speech rights of adults, children and its dozens of members, including Google, Meta Platforms, Netflix, Reddit and Elon Musk’s X.

Jumpstart your morning with the latest legal news delivered straight to your inbox from The Daily Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Report Ad

The judge issued a preliminary injunction against the law known as Senate Bill 854, which had been signed last May by then-Governor Glenn Youngkin, a Republican, and took effect on January 1, 2026.

NetChoice has also challenged similar laws in states, including California.

Virginia argued that the law was reasonably tailored to protect children from the “addictive features” of social media, and address a mental health crisis among youth.

But the judge said that notwithstanding Virginia’s interest in protecting children, the law was both overinclusive by requiring everyone, including adults, to verify their age, and underinclusive by exempting potentially addictive interactive gaming from coverage.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

She also said the law treats “functionally equivalent” speech differently by preventing children from watching, for example, science, history and church programming lasting more than an hour that they could watch elsewhere, including streaming platforms.

“The court recognizes the Commonwealth’s compelling interest in protecting its youth from the harms associated with the addictive aspects of social media,” wrote Giles, an appointee of former Democratic President Joe Biden. “However, it cannot infringe on First Amendment rights, including those of the same youth it aims to protect.”

Rae Pickett, a spokesperson for Virginia’s Democratic Attorney General Jay Jones, said after the decision: “We look forward to continuing to enforce laws that empower parents to protect their children from the proven harms that can come through social media.”

Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, welcomed the decision.

“This ruling reaffirms that the government cannot ration access to lawful speech – even if it has noble intentions,” he said in a statement. “Fundamentally, parents must stay in the driver’s seat when it comes to decisions about their families.”

Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Additional reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Nick Zieminski and Ethan Smith

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

• Suggested Topics:
• Society & Equity
• Constitutional Law
• Human Rights
• Judiciary
• Public Policy