发布于 2026年2月25日，美国东部时间凌晨1:31 | 美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）
作者：[阿里尔·爱德华兹-莱维] ，[詹妮弗·阿吉斯塔]
1小时35分钟前
唐纳德·特朗普总统于2026年2月24日在美国国会大厦发表国情咨文后离场。
肯尼·霍尔斯特恩/Pool/Getty Images
根据美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）与SSRS联合开展的民调显示，唐纳德·特朗普总统的国情咨文在以共和党人为主的观众群体中获得了普遍好评。
然而，即使在这个对其颇为友好的观众群体中，也有相当一部分人并未完全信服他正专注于国家最重要的问题，或认为他能够降低生活成本。
近三分之二的观众表示，他们对特朗普的演讲至少有一定程度的积极反应，其中仅有38%的人给出了非常积极的评价。这一结果比去年他向国会发表演讲时的反响稍逊一筹，也低于其在CNN民调中第一任期内演讲的支持率。这一数据与前总统乔·拜登在其任期最后一年的演讲支持率相近。
总统向国会发表的演讲通常会得到积极评价，因为这类演讲的受众往往是与总统所在政党高度一致的支持者。自克林顿时代起，CNN每年都会进行演讲反响民调，结果均显示观众反应积极。
周二观看特朗普演讲的人群中，共和党人的比例比普通公众高出约13个百分点。
特朗普的演讲似乎鼓舞了部分观众。在演讲前的一项调查中，54%的受访者认为他的政策会将国家引向正确方向；而在演讲后，这一比例上升至64%。认为特朗普优先处理了正确问题的比例也从演讲前的44%提升至54%。
在演讲前的调查中，大多数观众表示他们最希望听到特朗普谈论经济和生活成本问题。然而，近一半（45%）的观众认为，在这场创下最长时长纪录的国情咨文演讲中，特朗普对这一问题的关注过少；另有53%的观众认为他的关注程度恰到好处。
观众对特朗普处理关税问题的看法存在分歧：一部分人认为这是合理使用权力，另一部分人则认为这是越权行为。仅有31%的人对总统降低生活成本的能力表示高度信心，29%表示有一定信心，40%则完全没有信心。
演讲结束后，62%的观众认为特朗普的经济政策和移民政策都将把国家引向正确方向。
尽管经济相关数据与去年演讲后的结果持平，但移民政策方面的支持率却回落至其第一任期水平——当时移民问题是他最重大的政治软肋之一。对特朗普移民问题关注程度不满的观众中，更多人认为他关注过多（38%）而非不足（6%）。
45%的观众对特朗普领导国家的能力表示高度信心，43%对其负责任地使用美国军事力量表示高度信心，38%对其在伊朗问题上做出正确决策表示高度信心。
尽管国情咨文长期以来被视为总统扭转公众对其施政看法的机会，但历史经验表明，此类演讲不太可能对特朗普在美国民众中的支持率产生重大影响。近年来，年度总统演讲很少能显著改变美国公众对总统的支持率。
在演讲前几天进行的一项CNN全国民调中，特朗普的支持率为36%。
本次CNN民调通过短信调查了482名美国成年人，这些受访者均表示观看了周二的总统演讲，且仅代表演讲观众的观点。受访者在演讲前被招募参与调查，并通过SSRS意见小组的概率抽样技术选取。完整的演讲观众样本误差范围为±5.5个百分点。
Trump’s State of the Union left some viewers unconvinced that he’ll lower cost of living, CNN poll finds
Published Feb 25, 2026, 1:31 AM ET | CNN
By
[Ariel Edwards-Levy]
,
[Jennifer Agiesta]
1 hr 35 min ago
President Donald Trump leaves after delivering the State of the Union address at the US Capitol on February 24, 2026.
Kenny Holston/Pool/Getty Images
President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address drew largely positive marks from a heavily Republican audience, according to a CNN poll conducted by SSRS.
But it didn’t fully convince significant shares of even that friendly audience that he’s focusing on the nation’s most important problems or that he’ll lower the cost of living.
Nearly two-thirds of speech-watchers said they had at least a somewhat positive reaction to Trump’s speech, with a smaller 38% offering a very positive response. That’s a few points cooler than the reception to his address to Congress last year and falls below the ratings for his first-term speeches in CNN polling. It’s similar to the ratings that former President Joe Biden saw during his last year in office.
Good marks from speech-watchers are typical for presidential addresses to Congress, which tend to attract generally friendly audiences that disproportionately align with presidents’ own parties. In CNN’s speech reaction polls, which have been conducted most years dating back to the Clinton era, audience reactions have always been positive.
The pool of people who watched Trump speak on Tuesday was about 13 percentage points more Republican than the general public.
Trump’s speech seemed to rally some who watched it. In a survey conducted prior to the speech, 54% said they believed his policies would move the country in the right direction; afterward, 64% of the same people said his policies would take the country down the right path. The share who believed Trump has had the right priorities stood at 44% prior to the speech and 54% immediately following its conclusion.
In the pre-speech survey, a majority of viewers said they most wanted to hear Trump talk about the economy and the cost of living. But nearly half of the audience, 45%, said that, based on Trump’s speech – which set a record for the longest State of the Union address – he was focusing too little on the issue, with 53% saying he’d given the issue the right amount of focus.
Speech-watchers were about evenly split on whether Trump’s handling of tariffs was an appropriate use of power, or whether it represented an overstep on his part. And just 31% expressed a lot of confidence in the president to make the cost of living more affordable, with 29% saying they had some confidence in him to do so and 40% that they had none at all.
Following the address, 62% of speech-watchers said both that Trump’s economic policies and his immigration policies would move the country in the right direction.
While the economic numbers are identical to his ratings after last year’s speech, Trump’s numbers on immigration represent an erosion to first-term levels, when the issue stood as one of his most significant political liabilities. The minority of speech-watchers who were dissatisfied with his level of focus on immigration were more likely to say he’d paid the issue too much attention (38%), not too little (6%).
Forty-five percent of speech-watchers said they had a lot of confidence in Trump to provide real leadership for the country, and 43% expressed a lot of confidence in him to use US military power responsibly, with 38% saying they were highly confident in him to make the right decisions about Iran.
While State of the Union addresses have long been seen as a chance for the president to shift public perception of his efforts, history suggests that the speech is unlikely to have much effect on Trump’s standing with Americans. Annual presidential addresses rarely lead to significant shifts in presidential approval among the broader US public, particularly in recent years.
In a CNN poll of the American public conducted in the days prior to the address, Trump’s approval rating stood at 36%.
The CNN poll was conducted by text message with 482 US adults who said they watched the presidential address on Tuesday and are representative of the views of speech-watchers only. Respondents were recruited to participate before the speech and were selected by a survey of members of the SSRS Opinion Panel, a nationally representative panel recruited using probability-based sampling techniques. Results for the full sample of speech-watchers have a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 5.5 percentage points.
发表回复