特朗普抨击自己提名的最高法院大法官关税裁决:”他们家人的耻辱”


2026年2月20日 / 美国东部时间下午5:29 / CBS新闻

华盛顿 — 最高法院推翻特朗普总统全面性全球关税政策数小时后,总统将怒火对准了六位裁定对其不利的大法官——其中包括两名由特朗普总统提名的保守派法学家。

特朗普向记者表示,他”为法院的某些成员感到羞耻”。他批评了三名自由派大法官,称他们是”自动否决者”,但对三名保守派大法官尤为不满,这三位大法官裁定《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA)并未赋予总统单方面征收关税的权力。

“你不能否定他们的忠诚,”特朗普谈到自由派大法官时表示,”这是你可以对我们中的一些人做的事情。”

在裁定中反对政府关税策略的三名保守派大法官是乔治·W·布什任命的首席大法官约翰·罗伯茨,以及特朗普第一任期内任命的两位大法官:尼尔·戈萨奇和艾米·科尼·巴雷特。

当被问及是否后悔提名戈萨奇和巴雷特时,特朗普拒绝回答,但称这一决定”是他们家人的耻辱”。

他还毫无证据地声称,法院”受到外国利益集团的影响”,并表示多数派大法官是”傻瓜和激进左翼民主党人的哈巴狗”。RINOs是”名义上的共和党人”的缩写。

特朗普对其第三位最高法院提名人布雷特·卡瓦诺大法官大加赞赏,卡瓦诺撰写了主要的反对意见,认为总统根据IEEPA拥有征收关税的权力。卡瓦诺还列举了其他可能被援引以证明征税合法性的法律,其中一些总统表示他将使用。特朗普称他为”天才”,并表示他的声望正在上升。

这一裁决可能会在周二特朗普总统的国情咨文演讲期间造成一种奇怪的局面,通常最高法院大法官会出席该演讲。总统周五告诉记者,大法官们仍在受邀之列,但六位裁定对其不利的大法官”几乎没有被邀请”,而三位持反对意见的大法官”受到热烈邀请”。

“他们来不来我根本不在乎,”特朗普说。

最高法院发言人未立即回应置评请求。

历任总统都曾批评最高法院的判决,但从未像特朗普周五那样尖锐或进行人身攻击。2023年6月,最高法院推翻了前总统拜登4000亿美元学生贷款减免计划,拜登称该决定”是个错误”且”不正确”,并表示多数派”误解了宪法”。

随后,2024年7月最高法院裁定总统在任期间的官方行为享有联邦起诉豁免权,拜登称这一决定”对美国人民造成了极大伤害”,并表示这延续了法院对”一系列长期确立的原则”的攻击。

2010年国情咨文演讲中,时任总统奥巴马批评最高法院在标志性的竞选资金案”联合公民诉联邦选举委员会”中做出的裁决,警告这将”为包括外国公司在内的特殊利益集团在联邦选举中无限制支出打开闸门”。

坐在最高法院同事身旁的塞缪尔·阿利托大法官摇了摇头,似乎对着奥巴马的评论口型说”不是真的”。此后他不再出席国情咨文演讲。

特朗普过去曾批评最高法院的判决对其不利。在法院拒绝受理得克萨斯州试图阻止其2020年选举失利认证的诉讼后,总统称法院”真的让我们失望了。毫无智慧,毫无勇气!”

2023年一次演讲中,特朗普卸任期间曾称他的提名人是”杰出人士”和”伟大学者”,并表示他们”做得很好”——”除了对我来说,”他开玩笑说。

“老实说,他们帮不了我太多,”总统表示,”他们太多次投我反对票了,但生活中总有这样的小事,对吧?”

特朗普对最高法院的三次任命使法院转向保守。自2020年巴雷特被确认接替已故大法官露丝·巴德·金斯伯格以来,保守派多数派扩大到6-3,最高法院推翻了确立宪法堕胎权的”罗诉韦德案”,终结了高等教育中的平权行动,并削弱了联邦机构的监管权。

法院的保守派多数派还在2022年扩大了持枪权,首次认定第二修正案保护公开携带枪支的权利。

在特朗普第一任期内,帮助其塑造司法机构的一位有影响力的顾问是伦纳德·利奥,前联邦党人协会领导人,曾就最高法院提名人向总统提供建议。

此后,特朗普与这位有影响力的法律活动家关系破裂。去年上诉法院对其关税政策做出不利裁决后,特朗普公开指责利奥,称他是”卑鄙小人”和”坏人”,”可能憎恨美国”。

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-says-he-absolutely-ashamed-supreme-court-justices-who-ruled-against-his-tariffs/

Trump lashes out at his own Supreme Court picks over tariff ruling: “An embarrassment to their families”

February 20, 2026 / 5:29 PM EST / CBS News

Washington — Hours after the Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, the president directed his ire at the six justices who ruled against him — including a pair of conservative jurists who were nominated to the bench by Mr. Trump.

Mr. Trump told reporters he’s “ashamed of certain members of the court.” He criticized the three liberal members, calling them an “automatic no,” but appeared especially frustrated with the three conservatives who concluded that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, doesn’t give the president the power to unilaterally impose tariffs.

“You can’t knock their loyalty,” Mr. Trump said of the liberal justices. “That’s one thing you can do with some of our people.”

The three conservatives who ruled against the administration’s tariff strategy were George W. Bush-appointed Chief Justice John Roberts, and two justices who were appointed in Mr. Trump’s first term: Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett.

Asked if he regrets nominating Gorsuch and Barrett, Mr. Trump declined to answer, but called the decision “an embarrassment to their families.”

He also alleged — without evidence — that the court has been “swayed by foreign interests,” and said the justices in the majority were “fools and lap dogs for the RINOs and the radical left Democrats.” RINOs is short for “Republicans in name only.”

Mr. Trump heaped praise on his third nominee to the court, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who penned the principal dissenting opinion, arguing that the president’s power under IEEPA encompasses tariffs. Kavanaugh also laid out a menu of other laws that could be invoked to potentially justify levies, some of which the president indicated he would use. Mr. Trump called him a “genius” and said his stock is on the rise.

The ruling could make for a strange dynamic during Mr. Trump’s State of the Union address on Tuesday, which some Supreme Court justices usually attend. The president told reporters Friday the justices are still invited, but the six who ruled against him are “barely invited,” while the three dissenting justices are “happily invited.”

“I couldn’t care less if they come,” Mr. Trump said.

A spokesperson for the Supreme Court did not immediately return a request for comment.

Prior presidents have criticized the Supreme Court for decisions they disagree with, though not as sharply as Mr. Trump did Friday or through personal attacks. After the high court in June 2023 struck down former President Joe Biden’s plan to forgive $400 billion in student-loan debt, Biden called the decision “a mistake” and “wrong,” and said the majority “misinterpreted the Constitution.”

Then, after the Supreme Court ruled in July 2024 that presidents have immunity from federal prosecution for official actions taken while in office, Biden said the decision was a “terrible disservice to the people of this nation” and a continuation of what he said was the court’s attack “on a wide range of long-established principles.”

During his State of the Union address in 2010, then-President Barack Obama criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark campaign finance case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, warning it would “open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit” in federal elections.

Justice Samuel Alito, sitting alongside his Supreme Court colleagues, shook his head and appeared to mouth “not true” in response to Obama’s comments. He has not attended a State of the Union since.

Mr. Trump has criticized the Supreme Court in the past for ruling against him. After the court declined to take a longshot lawsuit from the state of Texas to halt the certification of his 2020 election loss, the president said the court “really let us down. No Wisdom, No Courage!”

And in a 2023 speech, while Mr. Trump was out of office, he called his nominees “outstanding people” and “great scholars” who have “done a great job” — “except for me,” he joked.

“They don’t help me much, I’ve got to tell you that,” the president said. “They vote against me too much, but one of those little things in life, right?”

Mr. Trump’s three appointments to the Supreme Court shifted the court to the right. In the years since Barrett was confirmed to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2020, which expanded its conservative majority to 6-3, the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade, which established the constitutional right to abortion, ended affirmative action in higher education and curtailed the regulatory power of federal agencies.

The court’s conservative majority also expanded gun rights in 2022, recognizing for the first time that the Second Amendment protects the right to carry a firearm in public.

One influential adviser who helped Mr. Trump shape the judiciary in his first term was Leonard Leo, a former Federalist Society leader who advised the president on Supreme Court picks.

Since then, Mr. Trump has had a falling-out with the powerful legal activist. After an appellate court ruled against his tariffs last year, Mr. Trump publicly blamed Leo, whom he called a “sleazebag” and a “bad person” who “probably hates America.”

https://www.cbsnews.com/video/trump-says-he-absolutely-ashamed-supreme-court-justices-who-ruled-against-his-tariffs/

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注