独家:美国最高法院裁决或致1750亿美元关税收入面临退还风险,宾夕法尼亚大学沃顿商学院估算


2026年2月20日 上午11:02 UTC / 路透社

作者:David Lawder

image

  • 摘要
  • 美国最高法院最早可能于周五就特朗普的紧急关税政策作出裁决
  • 宾夕法尼亚大学沃顿商学院预算模型基于各国、各产品的关税税率及进口数据构建预测模型得出估算
  • 1750亿美元的退款规模可能超过美国交通部和司法部的年度支出总和

华盛顿,2月20日(路透社)- 宾夕法尼亚大学沃顿商学院预算模型(PWBM)的经济学家周五表示,如果美国最高法院对唐纳德·特朗普总统实施的广泛紧急关税政策作出不利裁决,美国面临超过1750亿美元关税收入需退还的风险。

该校无党派财政研究机构PWBM的高级经济学家Lysle Boller称,应路透社要求进行的估算基于一套从零开始构建的预测模型,该模型结合了特朗普政府依据《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA)对不同国家、不同产品征收的关税税率及进口数据。

路透社内部追踪通讯是您了解全球体育重大赛事的必备指南。点击此处注册

广告 · 滚动继续

美国最高法院最早可能于周五就《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA)授权的关税合法性作出裁决。若裁决认定这些关税违法,进口商预计将纷纷向美国海关与边境保护局(CBP)申请退还过去一年缴纳的进口关税。

特朗普曾吹嘘其所有关税政策带来的财政收入,国会预算办公室(CBO)估计这些关税在未来十年每年将带来约3000亿美元收入,但此次估算显示,若最高法院裁定特朗普的关税政策违法,其中相当一部分收入可能需要退还。

1750亿美元的退款金额将超过美国财政部2025财年对交通部(1276亿美元支出)和司法部(449亿美元支出)的预算总和。

其他计算方法

Boller表示,PWBM模型(专为长期收入预测设计)通过交叉参考美国人口普查局提供的约11000种产品进口类别数据(基于233个国家的8位关税编码),并应用统计预测方法,得出基于IEEPA的关税每日收入约为5亿美元。截至周四,该模型估算自2025年2月特朗普依据《国际紧急经济权力法》开始征收关税以来,IEEPA相关关税收入总额已达1790亿美元。

PWBM还通过推算美国海关与边境保护局(CBP)此前公布的IEEPA关税及其他贸易救济关税评估数据(占美国财政部持续关税收入的比例),得出了1750亿至1760亿美元的类似估算结果。

CBP于12月14日最后一次公布基于IEEPA的关税及其他贸易救济关税的海关评估数据,当时显示自该法律下首批关税实施以来,面临退还风险的总额为1335亿美元。由于关税评估会因调整和修正而产生退款,实际净关税收入通常会略低。

PWBM模型还能快速调整特朗普政府有时突然变动的关税政策,包括贸易协议中对特定国家商品进口税率的下调。例如,韩国对美出口商品的关税税率从25%降至15%(2025年11月生效)。

该模型还捕捉到了依据IEEPA实施的惩罚性关税变动,例如2025年8月对巴西征收40%关税以惩罚其对特朗普盟友、前总统Jair Bolsonaro的起诉,以及同年11月取消对巴西咖啡、牛肉和可可的关税。

美国财政部长Scott Bessent在1月向路透社表示,财政部有能力轻松应对任何关税退款,但他坚信最高法院会支持基于IEEPA的关税政策。财政部在其借贷计划中继续规划大额现金余额,预计3月底将达8500亿美元,6月底将达9000亿美元。

财政部近几个月报告称关税收入大幅增长,较特朗普实施关税前同期每月增长约200亿美元,1月总关税收入达277亿美元。特朗普政府官员表示,如果法院裁定IEEPA关税违法,他们将转而使用其他关税授权机制恢复关税政策。

报道:David Lawder;编辑:Stephen Coates

我们的标准:路透社信任原则。点击查看

Exclusive: US tariff revenue at risk in Supreme Court ruling tops $175 billion, Penn-Wharton estimates

February 20, 2026 11:02 AM UTC / Reuters

By David Lawder

节点运行失败

Shipping containers are seen at the port of Oakland, as trade tensions continued over U.S. tariffs with China, in Oakland, California, U.S., May 12, 2025. REUTERS/Carlos Barria Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab

  • Summary
  • U.S. Supreme Court could rule as early as Friday on Trump’s emergency tariffs
  • Penn-Wharton estimate based on forecasting model using tariff rates by country, product import data
  • Refunds of $175 billion could top annual outlays of Transportation, Justice departments

WASHINGTON, Feb 20 (Reuters) – More than $175 billion in U.S. tariff collections are at risk of having to be refunded if the U.S. Supreme Court rules against President Donald Trump’s broad emergency tariffs, Penn-Wharton Budget Model economists said on Friday.

Their estimate, produced at a request from Reuters, was derived from a ground-up forecasting model that uses tariff rates by product and country for specific duties imposed by Trump, including those under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), said Lysle Boller, senior economist for Penn-Wharton Budget Model (PWBM), a non-partisan fiscal research group at the University of Pennsylvania.

The Reuters Inside Track newsletter is your essential guide to the biggest events in global sport. Sign up here.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

The U.S. Supreme Court could rule on the legality of the IEEPA-based tariffs as early as Friday. If they are struck down, importers are expected to scramble for refunds from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency on import duties paid over the past year.

Trump has touted the revenue generated by all of his tariffs, estimated by the Congressional Budget Office at about $300 billion annually over the next decade, but the estimates show that a substantial amount may need to be refunded if the court rules against Trump.

Refunds of $175 billion would exceed the combined fiscal 2025 outlays from the Department of Transportation at $127.6 billion and the Department of Justice at $44.9 billion.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

ALTERNATIVE CALCULATIONS

Boller said the PWBM model, built for long-term revenue forecasts, cross-references U.S. Census Bureau import data on around 11,000 product import categories based on eight-digit tariff codes across 233 countries, and applies statistical forecasting methods to come up with about $500 million in IEEPA-based revenue collected daily. As of Thursday, that model estimated $179 billion in total receipts under IEEPA since Trump began imposing tariffs under that law in February 2025.

PWBM also extrapolated past CBP IEEPA customs duty assessment data, opens new tab as a share of continuing U.S. Treasury customs receipts and came up with a similar estimate of $175 billion to $176 billion, he added.

CBP last published its customs assessments under IEEPA-based tariffs and other trade remedy duties on December 14, at that time showing an at-risk total of $133.5 billion since the first duties under the law were imposed. Net duty collections are typically slightly lower because the tariff assessments are subject to adjustments and corrections that result in refunds.

The PWBM model also makes quick adjustments for sometimes-abrupt tariff changes by Trump, including from trade deals that cut import duty rates for goods from certain countries. South Korea, for example, saw its U.S. tariff rate drop to 15% from 25% in November.

It also has captured changes in punitive duties under IEEPA, such as the imposition last August of a 40% tariff to punish Brazil over the prosecution of Trump ally and former President Jair Bolsonaro, and the removal of duties on Brazilian coffee, beef and cocoa in November.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Reuters in January that the Treasury can easily cover any tariff refunds, though he is confident that the Supreme Court will uphold the IEEPA tariffs. The Treasury is continuing to plan for large cash balances in its borrowing plans, $850 billion at the end of March and $900 billion at the end of June.

The Treasury has been reporting large gains in customs receipts in recent months, up roughly $20 billion a month from prior-year periods before Trump imposed the duties, with about $27.7 billion in total customs receipts in January. Trump administration officials say they will switch to alternative tariff authorities to restore tariffs if the court declares IEEPA tariffs illegal.

Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Stephen Coates

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注