2026-02-19T20:38:25.845Z / CNN政治
作者:布莱恩·托德
更新于59分钟前
更新时间:2026年2月19日,美国东部时间下午6:07
发布时间:2026年2月19日,美国东部时间下午3:38
(注:图片实际内容为2025年2月7日,华盛顿特区退伍军人事务部总部外的部门徽章)
Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg/Getty Images
美国退伍军人事务部(VA)已暂停对一项新的残疾抚恤金评定规则的执行。此前,全美退伍军人对该规则可能大幅削减众多退伍军人福利表示强烈愤怒。
该规则规定,退伍军人的残疾等级将基于其在治疗伤病或疾病时的功能表现,而非仅仅依据损伤本身。
例如,若一名退伍军人因服役导致膝盖受伤,但所服药物帮助其更好地恢复功能,这种情况在评定福利金额时将被纳入考量。该规则周二在《联邦公报》上发布,并立即生效。
所谓的”临时规则”中称:”如果药物或其他治疗减轻了残疾造成的功能损害,从而提高了退伍军人的工作能力,那么这才是退伍军人应获得补偿的适当残疾等级。”
但VA周四表示,在退伍军人迅速且强烈反对后,将暂停执行该规则。
退伍军人事务部部长道格·柯林斯在X平台(原推特)的声明中称:”尽管VA并不认同对该规则的某些表述,但本部门始终高度重视退伍军人的关切。为缓解这些担忧,VA将继续收集公众对该规则的意见,但未来任何时候都不会强制执行此规则。”
在此之前,当VA暂停执行该规则时,非营利组织”外国战争退伍军人协会”(VFW)曾批评该规则操之过急,可能惩罚那些遵医嘱用药的退伍军人。在VA撤回该规则后,VFW表示对此举措表示赞赏,同时呼吁今后保持透明。
VFW在给CNN的声明中称:”我们感谢柯林斯部长听取了VFW、我们的合作组织以及国家退伍军人、家属和幸存者的心声。VFW热切希望与退伍军人事务部合作,制定公平的解决方案。”
新泽西州民主党国会候选人、前海军直升机飞行员丽贝卡·贝内特称该规则”简直疯了”,并表示已有退伍军人联系她,称他们将停止服药。
贝内特在X平台发布的视频中说:”他们担心自己的残疾评级受到影响。如果你被诊断出患有癌症并接受化疗,你仍然患有癌症。”
VA的评级系统最高为100%,根据退伍军人损伤和疾病的综合严重程度评定。残疾评级越高,退伍军人从VA获得的补偿就越多。
然而,VA暂停执行该规则的举动仍遭到一位国会资深退伍军人的质疑。
伊利诺伊州民主党参议员塔米·达克沃斯(Tammy Duckworth)是一名参战受伤的退伍军人、前VA副部长,目前担任参议院退伍军人事务委员会成员。在VA撤回该规则后不久,她在X平台向柯林斯喊话:
“你退缩是因为你知道这项新规则可能会损害我们英雄获得医疗服务的机会,全国各地的退伍军人都在痛斥你的胡说八道。如果你真的重视退伍军人的关切,就应该彻底废除这项规则。”
除了批评,该规则似乎也引发了诸多困惑。
柯林斯和VA新闻秘书彼得·卡斯帕罗维奇此前均表示,新规则”不会对任何退伍军人当前的残疾评级产生影响”,即规则实施前已获得残疾抚恤金的退伍军人,其残疾评级仍不会考虑药物的影响。
经常公开为退伍军人发声、曾批评特朗普政府时期VA的陆军参战退伍军人克里斯托弗·戈德史密斯(Kristofer Goldsmith)在VA暂停执行规则前告诉CNN,他担心服用精神疾病药物(如创伤后应激障碍PTSD)的退伍军人可能会停药。
戈德史密斯说:”在一些退伍军人看来,与其让家庭陷入经济困境,宁愿承受PTSD或其他疾病的全部影响。”
该规则与三项法院裁决相悖,这三项裁决均认为VA不能因药物效果而降低残疾评级。VA在《联邦公报》的备案中称,2025年最新的”英格拉姆诉柯林斯”案是”对法规的错误解读”,将导致”高昂的行政成本、福利发放延迟”,并”因退伍军人实际并未承受的残疾水平而大幅增加补偿支出”。
VA此前已因该规则面临法律诉讼。亚利桑那州Stone Rose律师事务所和华盛顿州MilVet律师事务所周三提起诉讼,这两家律所均代表数百名退伍军人处理残疾案件。他们要求联邦上诉法院撤销新规则,称其”给客户造成经济损害”。
本报道已更新更多细节。
VA backs off rule that would have cut benefits amid outrage
2026-02-19T20:38:25.845Z / CNN Politics
By Brian Todd
Updated 59 min ago
Updated Feb 19, 2026, 6:07 PM ET
PUBLISHED Feb 19, 2026, 3:38 PM ET
The seal of the Department of Veterans Affairs outside its headquarters in Washington, DC, on February 7, 2025.
Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg/Getty Images
The Department of Veterans Affairs is halting enforcement of a new rule for determining disability payments after veterans across the US expressed outrage for what they said would likely reduce benefits for many.
The rule said a veteran’s disability level would be based on how well they function while on medication for an injury or illness and not simply having the impairment itself.
For example, if a veteran has a service-related knee injury but medication they take helps them function better, that would be taken into account when determining how much they receive in benefits. It was published Tuesday in the Federal Register and was effective immediately.
“If medication or other treatment lessens the functional impairment a disability causes and thereby improves a veteran’s earning capacity, that is the proper disability level for which the veteran should be compensated,” the so-called interim rule states.
But the VA said Thursday it will halt enforcement of the rule after veterans quickly and loudly opposed it.
“While VA does not agree with the way this rule has been characterized, the department always takes Veterans’ concerns seriously. To alleviate these concerns, VA will continue to collect public comments regarding the rule, but it will not be enforced at any time in the future,” VA Secretary Doug Collins said in a statement on X.
Before the VA halted enforcement of the rule, the Veterans of Foreign Wars non-profit organization criticized it, saying it was rushed and risked penalizing those who follow doctors’ orders. After the VA’s pullback, the VFW said it appreciated the move though it called for transparency going forward.
“We are appreciative of the Secretary’s decision in hearing the message of the VFW, our partner organizations and our nations veterans, family members and survivors. VFW is eager to work with the Department of Veterans Affairs to develop an equitable resolution,” the VFW said in a statement to CNN.
A former Navy helicopter pilot running for Congress as a Democrat in New Jersey called the rule “insane” and said she has already been contacted by veterans who told her they would stop taking their medication.
“They’re worried about their disability ratings getting impacted,” Rebecca Bennett said in a video posted on X. “If you are diagnosed with cancer and you are getting chemotherapy, you still have cancer.”
The VA’s rating system is on a scale up to 100%, based on the combined severity of the veteran’s injuries and illnesses. The higher the disability rating a veteran has, the more compensation they receive from the VA.
VA’s halt of enforcement for the rule was still met with cynicism by one prominent veteran in Congress.
Illinois Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth – a combat-wounded veteran, former VA Assistant Secretary and currently a member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee – addressed Collins on X shortly after the VA walked back enforcement of the rule.
“You’re backtracking because you know this new rule could hurt our heroes’ access to care, and Veterans across the country called you on your bullsh*t. If you take Veterans’ concerns seriously, you’d rescind the rule entirely,” Duckworth said.
Beyond criticism, the rule seemed to attract confusion as well.
Both Collins and VA press secretary Peter Kasperowicz said earlier the new rule would “have no impact on any Veteran’s current disability rating,” indicating that veterans who have received disability payments before the rule was imposed would continue to have disability ratings that do not take the effects of medication into account.
Kristofer Goldsmith, an Army combat veteran who often advocates publicly for veterans and has been a critic of the VA under the Trump administration, told CNN before the VA halted enforcement that he was worried about veterans who take medication for mental health illnesses, like PTSD, possibly ceasing their meds.
“In the minds of some veterans, it’s worth suffering the full effects of PTSD or another illness, rather than put your family at a financial disadvantage,” Goldsmith said.
The rule counters three court rulings which said the VA could not reduce disability ratings based on the effects of medication. In its Federal Register filing, the VA says the most recent of those court rulings, the 2025 case “Ingram vs. Collins,” was an “erroneous interpretation” of regulations, which would generate high administrative costs, create delays in delivering benefits,” and “cause an overall increase in compensation expenditures based on a disability level that veterans are not actually experiencing.”
The VA was already facing legal action over the rule. A lawsuit, filed Wednesday by the Arizona-based Stone Rose Law Firm and the MilVet Law Firm in Washington state, which both represent hundreds of veterans in disability cases, asks a federal appeals court to vacate the new rule saying it “results in financial harm to our clients.”
This story has been updated with additional details.
发表回复