2026年2月19日 / 美国东部时间上午10:53 / CBS新闻
联合国核监督机构负责人警告称，推动一项外交协议以避免美国与伊朗之间爆发战争”刻不容缓”，理由是伊朗浓缩核材料构成的风险——他表示，尽管美国去年对三个主要设施发动了打击，这些材料仍然基本完好无损，以及任何新的打击可能引发更广泛冲突的风险。
周二，美国和伊朗在日内瓦结束了一轮谈判，双方均表示取得了进展，但一名美国官员告诉CBS新闻，仍有”很多细节需要讨论”。该官员表示，预计伊朗将在几周内提出详细提案，”以解决我们立场中存在的一些分歧”。
在外交谈判持续的同时，特朗普总统加强了美国在该地区的军事存在，以支持他的威胁：如果无法达成协议来遏制伊朗的核计划，将发动新的打击。
在周三发布到网上的对法国TF1电视台的采访中，联合国国际原子能机构总干事拉斐尔·格罗西(Rafael Grossi)称日内瓦会谈是”向前迈进的两步”，但表示”仍需进一步努力”。
“问题在于，我们没有太多时间，”格罗西表示。
“伊朗在去年6月之前积累的大部分材料，尽管遭受了（美国）轰炸和袭击，仍然大量存在，就在打击发生时的位置，”格罗西说。”其中一些可能难以获取，但材料仍然存在。从防止扩散的角度来看，这些材料仍然存在。这就是为什么人们对达成一项能够防止该地区新军事行动的协议有如此高的兴趣——我想说，是紧迫性。”
特朗普和国防部长彼得·赫格斯泰特(Pete Hegseth)在6月的”午夜锤子行动”后声称，美国的打击”摧毁”了伊朗的核计划，但很快就出现了关于造成损害程度的质疑。
美国最初的一份机密评估认为，打击使德黑兰的核计划推迟了几个月，而特朗普则表示核计划被推迟了”基本上几十年”。
本周，当俄罗斯军舰和飞机加入伊朗在霍尔木兹海峡和阿曼湾的军事演习时，格罗西强调避免美国和伊朗之间的另一场军事对抗至关重要，他指出存在”向其他国家蔓延和扩大的真正风险”。
“必须尽一切努力避免这种情况，”他告诉法国网络。
“这是一段既有成功也有失败的漫长历史中的关键时刻。这也是长期僵局中的一个关键时刻，当然，这种僵局是由冲突形成的——包括去年6月的’12天战争’。现在有可能真正开始对话，这是第一次，才开始形成，”国际原子能机构负责人表示。”我本人被有关各方邀请，这是一个积极的信号，因为我们开始讨论具体问题——到底需要做什么。”
特朗普表示，在任何情况下，他都不会允许伊朗发展核武器能力。
当被问及国际原子能机构是否看到任何迹象表明伊朗目前可能正在努力发展这种能力时，格罗西明确表示，该机构没有看到任何迹象。
“没有，”他告诉TF1电视台，补充道：”相反，我看到，今天，双方都有达成协议的意愿。”
但格罗西谨慎的乐观情绪是在华盛顿越来越紧迫的言辞中出现的，有消息人士周三告诉CBS新闻，尽管特朗普尚未做出最终决定，但他至少正在考虑在本周末对伊朗发动袭击。
“现在是伊朗加入我们正在走的道路的时候了，”特朗普周四在华盛顿他的和平委员会会议上说。”如果没有发生，那也没办法。但如果不发生，就会发生坏事。”
波兰总理唐纳德·图斯克(Donald Tusk)周四敦促在伊朗的任何波兰公民立即离开该国。
“在任何情况下都不要去这个国家，”他说，称冲突在不久的将来可能发生，导致撤离不可能。
（配图：Planet Labs PBC拍摄的卫星图像显示，2026年1月28日伊朗伊斯法罕核技术中心位于伊朗伊斯法罕市外。Planet Labs PBC/AP）
（配图：伊朗外交部长阿拉格奇（右）于2026年2月16日在瑞士日内瓦会见国际原子能机构总干事拉斐尔·格罗西。伊朗外交部/法新社/盖蒂图片社）
Iran nuclear material “still there, in large quantities,” IAEA chief says, calling for urgent deal with U.S.
February 19, 2026 / 10:53 AM EST / CBS News
The head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog agency has warned of “urgency” in the push for a diplomatic agreement to avert a war between the United States and Iran, citing the risk presented by Iran’s enriched nuclear material, which he said remained largely intact despite U.S. strikes on three major facilities last year, and the risk of any new strikes sparking a wider conflict.
The U.S. and Iran concluded a round of negotiations on Tuesday in Geneva, with both sides saying progress was made, but a U.S. official telling CBS News there were “still a lot of details to discuss.” The official said Iran was expected to come back within a couple weeks with detailed proposals “to address some of the open gaps in our positions.”
While that diplomacy continues, President Trump has bolstered the U.S. military presence in the region to back up his threat of new strikes if no agreement is reached to rein in Iran’s nuclear program.
In an interview with French network TF1 posted online Wednesday, Rafael Grossi, the director general of the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency, referred to the Geneva talks, during which he met with Iranian officials in the Swiss capital, as “two steps forward,” but said “further efforts are still needed.”
“The problem is, we don’t have much time,” Grossi said.
Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi (right) meeting with International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi in Geneva, Switzerland, Feb. 16, 2026. Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs/AFP/Getty
“Most of the material that Iran had accumulated up until June of last year, despite the [U.S.] bombings and the attacks, is still there, in large quantities, where it was at the time of the strikes,” Grossi said. “Some of it may be less accessible, but the material is still there. From a non-proliferation standpoint, the material remains. That is why there is so much interest — I would say urgency — in reaching an agreement that would prevent new military action in the region.”
Mr. Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed after “Operation Midnight Hammer” in June that the American strikes had “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program, but questions quickly arose over the extent of the damage inflicted.
An initial classified U.S. assessment found the strikes had set back Tehran’s nuclear program by a matter of months, while Mr. Trump said the nuclear program was set back “basically decades.”
As Russian warships and aircraft joined Iranian military exercises in the Strait of Hormuz and Gulf of Oman this week, Grossi stressed that it was vital to avoid another military confrontation between the U.S. and Iran, citing a “real risk of spillover and expansion to other countries.”
“Everything must be done to avoid that situation,” he told the French network.
“This is a key moment in a long history marked by both successes and failures. It is also a pivotal moment in a long-standing deadlock that has, of course, been shaped by conflict — including the ’12-day war’ in June last year. Now there is a possibility for a dialogue that is truly beginning, for the first time, to take shape,” the IAEA chief said. “The fact that I myself was invited by the parties involved is a positive sign, because we are starting to discuss concrete issues — what actually needs to be done.”
Mr. Trump has said he will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapons capacity, under any circumstances.
Asked whether the IAEA had seen any indication that Iran might currently be working to develop such a capacity, Grossi was clear that the agency had not.
“No,” he told TF1, adding: “On the contrary, I see, today, a willingness on both sides to reach an agreement.”
A satellite image from Planet Labs PBC shows Iran’s Esfahan Nuclear Technology Center outside of Isfahan, Iran, Jan. 28, 2026. Planet Labs PBC/AP
But Grossi’s cautious optimism came amid increasingly urgent rhetoric from Washington, as sources told CBS News on Wednesday that while Mr. Trump had not made a final decision, he was at least considering an attack on Iran as soon as this weekend.
“Now is the time for Iran to join us on a path that will complete what we’re doing,” Mr. Trump said Thursday at a gathering of his Board of Peace in Washington. “If it doesn’t happen, it doesn’t happen. But bad things will happen if it doesn’t.”
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk on Thursday urged any Polish citizens in Iran to leave the country immediately.
“Do not go to this country under any circumstances,” he said, citing the “very real” possibility of a conflict making evacuations impossible in the near future.
发表回复