美伊谈判周二取得进展 德黑兰称或开启框架性协议,但双方公开分歧凸显距离仍远


美国与伊朗周二的谈判取得进展,德黑兰方面称这是潜在框架协议的开端,但双方尖锐的公开分歧凸显了他们之间仍存在巨大差距。

伊朗外交部长阿巴斯·阿拉格奇(Abbas Araghchi)表示,双方已就“一系列指导原则达成总体协议”,并同意开始起草可能的协议文本,计划交换草案并安排第三轮谈判。

“与上一次会议相比取得了良好进展,”他补充道,尽管起草工作会减缓进程,但“至少道路已经开启”。

然而,华盛顿方面公开坚持,任何协议必须导致伊朗核计划——包括其铀浓缩能力——的拆除,同时限制德黑兰的弹道导弹计划,并停止对哈马斯和真主党等盟友激进组织的支持。这些要求远远超出了暂时暂停铀浓缩或技术性调整。

伊朗最高领袖阿里·哈梅内伊(Ali Khamenei)似乎直接反驳了这一前提,表明伊朗让步的坚定上限。

“美国人说,‘让我们就你的核能进行谈判,谈判结果应该是你不再拥有这种能源!’”他在谈判进行期间的社交媒体上写道,“如果是这样,就没有谈判的空间了。”

哈梅内伊的言论表明,尽管伊朗谈判代表可能在讨论限制或临时措施,但伊朗不太可能接受彻底消除其核计划的协议——这将直接与特朗普政府坚持的“拆除”立场发生碰撞。

“取得了进展,但仍有很多细节需要讨论,”一位美国官员表示。“伊朗方面称他们将在未来两周内提出详细建议,以解决我们立场中的一些悬而未决的分歧。”

美国总统唐纳德·特朗普周一表示,他将密切关注谈判。

双方的不信任根深蒂固。

伊朗官员指出,2025年6月美国对其核设施发动的军事打击是使外交复杂化的更广泛背景的一部分,认为此类行动表明华盛顿在谈判展开时仍愿意使用武力。

在外交推动的背后,美国已大幅扩大在该地区的军事存在。亚伯拉罕·林肯号航空母舰正在阿拉伯海行动,该航母上的F-35战斗机最近在接近打击群后击落了一架伊朗Shahed-139无人机——美国官员称此举表明对挑衅行为的低容忍度。

美国海军最新的航空母舰杰拉尔德·R·福特号(USS Gerald R. Ford)正驶向中东。特朗普总统2月13日证实了此次部署,称“如果我们没有达成协议,我们将需要它。”有报道称,第三艘航母乔治·H·W·布什号(USS George H.W. Bush)正准备可能的紧急部署,这将在伊朗水域附近形成罕见的三航母美国存在。

军事集结不仅限于海军。2月初,一个F-35A闪电II战斗机中队降落在英国皇家空军拉肯希思基地,作为可能部署到中东的集结点,而卫星图像显示更多美国飞机——包括F-15E攻击鹰和A-10雷电——部署在约旦的穆瓦法克·萨尔蒂空军基地。

该地区的后勤飞行也激增。

根据国防跟踪数据,自1月底以来已有100多架C-17运输机抵达,将先进防空系统(包括爱国者和萨德电池)运送到卡塔尔和沙特阿拉伯的基地。

与此同时,伊朗领导层将外交接触与强硬警告相结合。

哈梅内伊表示,美国可能会“受到重创,无法再站起来”,伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队海军的一名高级指挥官宣称,如果命令下达,该国准备关闭霍尔木兹海峡——这一行动可能扰乱全球约五分之一的石油通过这一战略水道的流动。

尽管言辞激烈和军事信号增强,伊朗官员仍表示谈判将继续,将日内瓦讨论视为可能达成协议的一步——尽管关于“拆除”与“保留”伊朗核能力的根本分歧仍未解决。

福克斯新闻的尼克·卡尔曼(Nick Kalman)对此报道有贡献。

Negotiations between the United States and Iran advanced Tuesday toward what Tehran described as the beginning of a potential framework, but sharp public divisions between the two sides underscored how far apart they remain.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the two sides reached a “general agreement on a number of guiding principles” and agreed to begin drafting text for a possible agreement, with plans to exchange drafts and schedule a third round of talks.

“Good progress was made compared to the previous meeting,” he said, adding that while drafting would slow the process, “at least the path has started.”

Yet Washington publicly has insisted that any agreement must result in the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear program — including its enrichment capacity — along with limits on Tehran’s ballistic missile program and an end to its support for allied militant groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah. Those demands go well beyond temporary enrichment pauses or technical adjustments.

Iran Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei appeared to push back directly against that premise, signaling a firm ceiling on Iran’s concessions.

“The Americans say, ‘Let’s negotiate over your nuclear energy, and the result of the negotiation is supposed to be that you do not have this energy!’” he wrote on social media as talks were underway. “If that’s the case, there is no room for negotiation.”

Khamenei’s remarks suggest that while Iranian negotiators may be discussing limits or interim measures, Iran is unlikely to accept an agreement that eliminates its nuclear program outright — setting up a direct collision with the Trump administration’s insistence on dismantlement.

“Progress was made, but there are still a lot of details to discuss,” according to a U.S. official. “The Iranians said they would come back in the next two weeks with detailed proposals to address some of the open gaps in our positions.”

President Donald Trump said Monday he would be watching the talks closely.

The mistrust runs deep.

Iranian officials have pointed to U.S. military strikes on their nuclear facilities in June 2025 as part of the broader backdrop complicating diplomacy, arguing such actions demonstrate Washington’s willingness to use force even as negotiations unfold.

Behind the diplomatic push, the United States has significantly expanded its military footprint in the region. The USS Abraham Lincoln is operating in the Arabian Sea, and F-35 fighter jets from the carrier shot down an Iranian Shahed-139 drone recently after it approached the strike group — a move U.S. officials described as demonstrating low tolerance for provocations.

The USS Gerald R. Ford, the Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, is now transiting toward the Middle East. President Trump confirmed the deployment on Feb. 13, saying, “In case we don’t make a deal, we’ll need it.” Reports indicate a third carrier, the USS George H.W. Bush, is being prepared for possible expedited deployment, which would create a rare three-carrier U.S. presence near Iranian waters.

The buildup extends beyond naval forces. A squadron of F-35A Lightning II aircraft landed at RAF Lakenheath in the United Kingdom earlier in February as a staging point for potential deployment to the Middle East, while satellite imagery shows additional U.S. aircraft — including F-15E Strike Eagles and A-10 Thunderbolts — positioned at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan.

Logistics flights into the region have also surged.

More than 100 C-17 cargo aircraft have arrived since late January, transporting advanced air defense systems, including Patriot and THAAD batteries, to bases in Qatar and Saudi Arabia, according to defense tracking data.

At the same time, Iran’s leadership has paired diplomatic engagement with forceful warnings.

Khamenei said the United States could be “struck so hard that it cannot get up again,” and a senior commander in Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy declared the country is prepared to close the Strait of Hormuz if ordered — a move that could disrupt roughly one-fifth of global oil flows through the strategic waterway.

Despite the heightened rhetoric and military signaling, Iranian officials said talks would continue, framing the Geneva discussions as a step toward a possible agreement — even as the fundamental dispute over dismantlement versus preservation of Iran’s nuclear capabilities remains unresolved.

Fox News’ Nick Kalman contributed to this report.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注