汤姆·霍曼在2026年2月15日《面对国家》节目中的访谈记录


2026-02-15T08:53:00-0500 / CBS新闻

以下是汤姆·霍曼(特朗普政府边境事务负责人)于2026年2月15日在《面对国家》节目中接受玛格丽特·布伦南采访的完整访谈记录。

*

埃德·奥基夫:早上好,欢迎收看《面对国家》。玛格丽特今天不在。华盛顿正面临又一轮资金僵局,目前尚不清楚何时能结束,因为国会将再休会一周。为了深入探讨移民执法策略的争议,我们邀请到了白宫边境事务负责人汤姆·霍曼先生。霍曼先生,非常感谢您接受我们的采访。

汤姆·霍曼:谢谢邀请我。

埃德·奥基夫:我们首先关注国土安全部重新启动的谈判。这些谈判围绕民主党提出的几项具体政策变化展开,涉及移民执法人员的行动规范。他们要求移民执法人员出示身份证明、佩戴随身摄像头、摘下口罩、停止种族定性(racial profiling)并在进入私人财产前获取司法令状。请问总统是否愿意考虑采纳其中任何一项要求?

汤姆·霍曼:嗯,我并未参与这些谈判。这些谈判是国会参众两院与白宫之间的事。我并不真正参与这些谈判。但你知道,他们说要停止种族定性,这根本不存在。我的意思是,美国移民和海关执法局(ICE)会短暂拘留并询问人员,但询问是基于合理怀疑,与种族定性毫无关系。至于口罩问题,我也不喜欢戴口罩,但由于对ICE官员的威胁实际上升了1500%,攻击和威胁上升了8000%,这些男女执法人员必须保护自己。至于身份识别,他们都佩戴着标识牌,表明自己是ICE、ERO、HSI、DEA、FBI等机构的人员,所以他们都有标识。我让白宫和国会议员们去解决这些问题。但我认为其中一些要求是不合理的,因为根本不存在种族定性问题。他们有身份标识,但为什么不谈立法禁止对执法人员进行恶意骚扰或其他类似行为呢?但目前,口罩是为了执法人员的安全考虑。

埃德·奥基夫:当然,联邦法律禁止伤害、威胁联邦当局人员,所以这一点是有法律依据的。我认为人们感到困惑的是,当地社区的警察、州警察和其他联邦特工会在翻领上佩戴姓名牌,表明所属机构。那么为什么这些移民执法人员需要有所不同呢?至于口罩问题,你知道,警察每天在全国各地都会受到各种威胁——

汤姆·霍曼:——我不认为——

埃德·奥基夫:但为什么他们必须佩戴这些装备并保护自己,而其他警察不需要呢?

汤姆·霍曼:同样,他们佩戴着徽章和标识牌,表明自己的所属机构——

埃德·奥基夫:但上面没有他们的名字,对吗?

汤姆·霍曼:至于口罩问题,我不认为这个国家有其他执法机构面临威胁增长8000%的情况。就在昨天,ICE局长的妻子在上班路上被拍到,他的家庭住址遭到曝光,孩子们也被曝光。所以,我不认为这个国家还有其他机构面临8000%的威胁增长。而且,我们要记住我们为什么要这么做,埃德。我们之所以在这里,是因为过去四年里,超过1000万非法移民越境进入美国,未经审查就被释放。ICE必须采取执法行动来应对过去四年的开放边境,当时有人声称边境是安全的,但实际上并非如此。

埃德·奥基夫:获取司法令状进入私人财产有什么问题吗?

汤姆·霍曼:这不是联邦法律的要求。国会自行制定了《移民与国籍法》,赋予了行政令状逮捕权,这是联邦法规规定的。如果国会希望改变这一规定,那么国会可以立法。但目前,ICE是在国会制定、总统签署的联邦法规框架内开展工作的。

埃德·奥基夫:我记得你之前曾表示,你认为搜查必须获得司法令状。现在政策发生了变化,ICE可以使用由ICE人员签发的行政令状。你为什么改变了主意?我是说,显然你至少在某个时候认为这是必要的。

汤姆·霍曼:不,我的想法没有改变。我所了解的情况是,我并未参与这些讨论,但司法部(DOJ)解释该法律时称,在某些情况下,针对已收到法官最终驱逐令的人员,可以使用行政令状进入其住所。我没有参与这些讨论,但这是司法部的指导意见。

埃德·奥基夫:上周,你宣布历时数月的“明尼苏达大都会行动”(Metro Surge)即将结束。ICE当然会继续在该州保持存在,但不会像最近几周那样大规模部署。如果局势继续缓和,这次行动何时会完全结束?

汤姆·霍曼:嗯,目前我们已经遣返了超过1000人,到周一和周二,我们还将再遣返数百人。我们将恢复原来的部署规模,除了负责欺诈调查的特工将留在那里并继续工作直到完成任务。调查教堂事件的特工也将继续工作。但会保留一支小型安全部队(我们称之为RFQs),当我们的特工外出时,如果遭到煽动者包围或局势失控,这支安全部队将进行响应。他们将在短期内留在那里,以确保我们与当地州执法部门的合作协议得以维持,并在必要时应对公共安全威胁。希望这些安全部队能够迅速撤离。我认为情况正在朝着正确的方向发展,我相信局势会继续好转。

埃德·奥基夫:这是国土安全部历史上规模最大的联邦移民执法人员部署。你预计会在其他类似规模的城市(如明尼阿波利斯)开展类似行动吗?

汤姆·霍曼:我认为这取决于具体情况。我从一开始就说过,我们需要在“庇护城市”增派更多特工。特工人数取决于现场情况,有多少已知的犯罪目标?因为我们知道“庇护城市”存在问题,因为他们会释放公共安全威胁分子,而不是将其逮捕入狱。这样,一名特工需要去追捕一名罪犯,这对特工、罪犯和社区来说都不安全。现在我们可以通过与监狱达成协议,将这些公共安全威胁分子关押在监狱中,这样就不需要派六七个特工去寻找他们。所以,我希望其他“庇护城市”能借鉴明尼苏达州的做法,看看我们是如何达到这一局面的,我认为这是一个很好的局面。我希望更多人关注这一点,我们与各州合作,让我们的官员进入监狱。你不能——很多左翼政客或民主党人说,好吧,ICE,我们同意你应该专注于公共安全威胁,应该专注于在美国犯下严重罪行的非法移民,但他们不让我们进入监狱。这是自相矛盾的。如果你真的希望我们专注于罪犯,那就让我们进入监狱。这是最安全、最可靠的工作场所。

埃德·奥基夫:如果我们能快速讨论几个其他问题,随着明尼阿波利斯行动的结束,现在最受质疑的是其中一个戏剧性事件。如你所知,两名ICE特工因视频证据显示其宣誓证词可能不真实,目前正在接受停职调查。就在该事件发生后几小时内,国土安全部曾表示,被枪击的移民目标是ICE特工,他们遭到伏击并担心自身安全。但现在这一说法似乎不成立。你认为这一事件加上明尼阿波利斯最近发生的两起致命枪击事件,以及芝加哥最近发生的一起事件——证据与政府声称一名妇女撞向特工车辆的说法相矛盾——我想知道,这一切是否会进一步削弱公众对ICE的信任?

汤姆·霍曼:嗯,你知道,我在明尼苏达州的第一次新闻发布会上说过,我正在增加内部事务特工的人数,以确保一线执法人员行为规范。你刚才提到的每一个事件都已移交内部事务部门处理。我知道FBI也在调查这些案件,所以我们将看看调查结果如何。但正如ICE主任上周五所说,人员将被问责并接受全面调查,无论调查结果如何,都将采取纪律处分或起诉。

埃德·奥基夫:是的。《华尔街日报》最近发布的一份报告详细描述了对国土安全部部长克里斯蒂·诺姆及其首席顾问科里·莱万多夫斯基领导的广泛担忧。报告称,尽管你从白宫角度监督移民问题,但你很少与诺姆部长或莱万多夫斯基交流,并且你多次向白宫抱怨他们。你对诺姆部长和科里·莱万多夫斯基有什么担忧?

汤姆·霍曼:看,我们是一个团队,共同战斗。我不会参与媒体炒作。他们试图分裂本届政府,攻击政府中工作的人员。我和诺姆部长在所有事情上都意见一致吗?不。这就是为什么我们会有讨论,为什么我们每天都会召开多机构电话会议和会议。我们讨论未来的工作,我们有不同的意见。嗯,这些不同意见会得到解决,然后我们继续前进。最重要的是,我们国家拥有历史上最安全的边境。我们逮捕和驱逐了创纪录数量的犯罪非法移民,因为我们是一个团队,共同战斗。结果不言而喻。

埃德·奥基夫:但你并不否认,你有时与他们存在分歧,即使分歧已经解决?

汤姆·霍曼:我与很多联邦机构有分歧,但这并不意味着分歧无法解决。我希望以这种方式开展工作,有人希望以另一种方式。然后我们讨论在这种情况下什么最有效。最终我们都会达成一致。我们已经做了40年了。我们有海关和边境保护局(CBP)的罗德尼·斯科特领导,他也做了30年。所以我们都来到谈判桌前,提出不同的想法,但我们会确定一项使命,我认为这个使命的结果是不言而喻的。再次强调,由于我们的合作,我们拥有了历史上最安全的边境,创纪录的犯罪非法移民被逮捕和驱逐。结果不言而喻。

Transcript: Tom Homan on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,” Feb. 15, 2026

2026-02-15T08:53:00-0500 / CBS News

The following is the transcript of the interview with Tom Homan, Trump administration border czar, that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on Feb. 15, 2026.

*

ED O’KEEFE: Good morning and welcome to ‘Face The Nation.’ Margaret is off today. Washington is waking up to another funding standoff, and it’s unclear at this point when it could end, as congress is on recess for another week. So for more on the debate over immigration enforcement tactics, we’re joined by White House border czar Tom Homan. Mr. Homan, thank you so much for joining us.

TOM HOMAN: Thanks for having me.

ED O’KEEFE: I want to begin, of course, with negotiations over reopening the Department of Homeland Security. They center around some specific policy changes Democrats demand in how immigration agents conduct operations. Among other things, they’d like to require immigration agents to show identification, wear body cameras, take off their masks, stop racial profiling and seek judicial warrants to enter private property. Which, if any of those asks are- is the president, are you willing consider- or willing to consider adopting?

TOM HOMAN: Well, I’m not a part of those negotiations. That’s being as being done up on the hill between Senate and House and the White House. I’m not really part of those negotiations. But look, you know, they want to say, stop racial profiling. That’s just not occurring. I mean, ICE will detain, briefly detain and question, but question somebody based on reasonable suspicion. It has nothing to do with racial profiling. As far as the mask look, you know, I don’t like the masks either, but because threats against ICE officers, you know, are up over 1500% actual assaults and threats are up over 8000%. These men and women have to protect themselves. As far as identifying themselves, they all have placards identifying themselves as ICE, ERO, HSI, DEA, FBI, so they all have placards on them. So I’ll let the White House and members of Congress, you know, fight that out. But I think some of the asks are just- I think they’re unreasonable because there is no racial profiling. There is identifying marks, but masks, you know, why don’t they talk about maybe passing legislation to make it illegal to dox agents or something like that? But the masks right now are for officer safety reasons.

ED O’KEEFE: There are federal laws, of course, against injuring, harming, threatening federal authorities, so there is that. And I think one of the things that people get hung up on is the idea that the cop on the street in their neighborhood, a state police officer, other federal agents will identify themselves with their name on their lapel. And yes, their employing agency. But why should these immigration agents be any different and when it comes to the masks as well? You know, cops go out every day, everywhere across the country get threatened in one way or another–

TOM HOMAN: –I don’t know of–

ED O’KEEFE: But why- why have to wear all that and protect themselves when there are others out there wearing badges that don’t have to do that?

TOM HOMAN: Well, again, they are wearing badges. They’re wearing placards to identify what agency they’re from–

ED O’KEEFE: But their name isn’t on it, right?

TOM HOMAN: When it comes to masks I don’t I- I don’t know of another law enforcement agency in the country that has an 8,000% increase in threats. Just yesterday, the director of ICE his wife was filmed walking to work. His home address has been doxed. His kids have been doxed and filmed. So no, I don’t know of another agency in this country that has an 8000% increase. And look, let’s remember why we’re here, Ed. We’re here because the last four years, over 10 million illegal aliens crossed that border, released in this country unvetted ICE has to do a law enforcement response to deal with the last four years open border, where they claim the border was secure every day and it wasn’t.

ED O’KEEFE: What’s so wrong about obtaining a judicial warrant to enter private property?

TOM HOMAN: That’s not what the federal law requires. Congress themselves wrote the Immigration Nationality Act that gave power on the administrative warrant to arrest somebody, and that’s what’s set up in federal statutes. So if Congress wants that change, then Congress can legislate. But right now, ICE is acting within the framework of federal statutes enacted by Congress and signed by a president.

ED O’KEEFE: Well, as I recall, you have previously said that you thought judicial warrants were necessary for searches. There’s been this change in policy in that now ICE can go with these administrative warrants that are issued by ICE personnel. Why your change of heart? I mean, clearly there- at one point, at least you agreed that was necessary.

TOM HOMAN: No, I don’t have a changed heart. What I understand, and I wasn’t part of those discussions, is that DOJ interpret that law saying in certain- in certain circumstances, administrative warrant on somebody has a final order removal already had a due process issued by a [unintelligible] judge that can enter a premises. I’m not a part of that discussion, but that’s the DOJ guidance.

ED O’KEEFE: Last week, you announced the months long operation known as Metro Surge in Minnesota is winding down. ICE, of course, is going to maintain a presence in the state, but not at the levels we’ve seen in recent weeks. If things keep winding down, when should that surge be over?

TOM HOMAN: Well, look about as of we already removed well over 1000 people, and as of Monday, Tuesday, we’ll remove several hundred more. We’ll get back to the original footprint, with the exception of the agents there to do the fraud investigation, will stay there and continue their work until they’re done. The agents investigating the church issue where the people went into the church, they’ll stay and get that work done. But there will be- there will be a small force, a security force, what we call RFQs, that will- our security forces, that will respond to when our agents are out and they get surrounded by agitators and things got out of control, and they’ll remain for a short period of time, just to make sure the coordination, the agreements we have with local state law enforcement, stay in place, and they respond to a public safety threat when needed. And so hopefully those security forces- security a small footprint, security forces can remove, can be removed really fairly quickly. I’m hoping. I think things are going the right direction, and I got faith they’ll continue that way.

ED O’KEEFE: This was the largest deployment of federal immigration agents in department history. Do you anticipate there will be others on the scale seen in Minneapolis?

TOM HOMAN: I think it depends on the situation. I’ve said from day one that, you know we need to- we need to flood the zone in sanctuary cities with additional agents. The number of agents depend on the situation on the ground. How many known criminal targets are out there? Because we know we have a problem with sanctuary cities, because we know they’re releasing public safety threats in the public so rather than arrest that one criminal in jail, one agent wrestling one criminal alien, the safety, and security of a jail, which is safer for the agent, safer for the aliens, safer for the community, they release them in the street. Now we got to send a whole team, or six or seven people. That is a win we had in Minnesota. Everybody- because now we have agreements and coordination with jails, we can rest that public safety threat in the safety security of jail, which means we don’t have to send six or seven people out to look for them. So, I’m hoping other sanctuary cities look at what was- what happened in Minnesota, and how we- how we got to the place reds, which I think is a good place. I hope more people pay attention to that, and we work with the states to let our officers in the jail. You can’t- a lot of politicians are out there on the left or the Democrats saying, okay, ICE, we agree. You should be focusing on public safety threats. You should be focusing on illegal aliens who have committed serious crimes in this country, but they lock us out of the jail. You can’t square that. If you really want us to focus on the criminals, then let us in the jail. That’s the safest, most secure place to do our work.

ED O’KEEFE: A few other things quickly, if we can, as the surge winds down in Minneapolis, one of the more dramatic incidents now is very much in question. As you know, two ICE agents now on administrative leave pending an internal investigation because video evidence shows their sworn testimony appears to have been untruthful. Only hours after that incident occurred, you’ll recall DHS had said the ICE officer who shot the migrant they were targeting was being ambushed and feared for his life. That now appears to be untrue. You take that incident combined with the two deadly shootings in Minneapolis and an incident in Chicago recently where evidence contradicted the government’s claim a woman rammed an agent’s vehicle, and I wonder, does this all just further undermine trust in ICE across the country?

TOM HOMAN: Well, look, you know, my first press conference in Minnesota, I said I was bringing additional internal affairs agents in, just to make sure officers in the field was doing the right thing. And every one of those instances you just talked about were turned over to internal affairs. I know the FBI is investigating the cases also, so we’ll see where those investigations lead. But as the ICE Director said on Friday, people will be held accountable and they’ll be fully investigated, and however that investigation comes out, then disciplinary action or prosecutions will occur.

ED O’KEEFE: Right. A Wall Street Journal report published in recent days, I’m sure you’ve seen it, details widespread concerns with the leadership of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and her chief advisor, Corey Lewandowski. The report says you rarely speak with the Secretary or Lewandowski, despite the fact that you oversee immigration issues as well from the White House perspective, and that you’ve repeatedly complained to the White House about them. What is your concern with Secretary Noem and Corey Lewandowski?

TOM HOMAN: Look, it’s one team, one fight. I’m not playing in that media. They’re trying to divide this administration. They want to attack the men and women who work in this administration. Look, do me and Secretary Noem agree on everything? No. That’s why we have discussions. That’s why every day we have a multi-agency conference call and meeting. We discuss going forward, and we have different opinions. Well, those different opinions are worked out, and we move forward. The bottom line is, we have the most secure border in history in this nation. We got record numbers of criminal aliens arrested and deported in this country because this is one team, one fight. The results speak for themselves.

ED O’KEEFE: But you don’t dispute, you’ve had disagreements with them at times, even if they’ve been resolved?

TOM HOMAN: I have a disagreement with we got- we got many federal agencies, and it’s not it’s- not like a out of control disagreement. I want to do it this way. Someone wants to do it this way. Then we talk about what works best in this situation. We all come to agreement in the end, but it’s a discussion of different ideas. I’ve been doing this for 40 years. We have the- Rodney Scott that runs CBP. He’s been doing it for 30 years. So we all come to the table. We come up with different ideas, but we settle on a mission, and I think the results of this mission speaks for themselves. Again, the most secure border in history of this nation, because of our collaboration and record numbers of criminal aliens being arrested and deported. The results speak for themselves.

ED O’KEEFE: Tom Homan, the White House border czar thank you for spending some of your Sunday with us. We appreciate it. ‘Face the Nation,’ we’ll be back in one minute. Stay with us.

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注