2026-02-10T11:00:47.631Z / CNN
[贝琪·克莱因],伊恩·贝里,[勒妮·里格登]
2小时前
发布于 2026年2月10日,美国东部时间上午6:00
唐纳德·特朗普
Facebook 推文[电子邮件]链接
链接已复制!
2025年10月15日,在白宫东厅的宴会厅筹款晚宴上,总统唐纳德·特朗普手持拱门模型发表讲话。
凯文·迪茨/盖蒂图片社
[唐纳德·特朗普总统]希望建造一座拱门,而且要成为世界上最大的拱门。尽管他暗示将签署行政命令推进该项目,但这一计划正面临阻力,并且在实施前可能会遇到法律障碍。
特朗普想要一座类似巴黎凯旋门的美国版本,但更大——这座[独立拱门]高250英尺,以纪念美国建国250周年(巴黎凯旋门高164英尺)。按照标准测量,这相当于一座16至20层的建筑。
这只是特朗普最新的、也是最高的一次试图将自己的风格和品味强加于华盛顿特区的努力,而且他一直亲自参与其中。但保护主义者警告说,这座拟议中的建筑将建在波托马克河对岸,毗邻林肯纪念堂,会遮挡两个方向的历史景观,并可能对附近的罗纳德·里根华盛顿国家机场的空中交通构成危险。
根据一位熟悉计划的消息人士透露,拟议拱门的结构高165英尺,宽165英尺,有一个25英尺高的基座,顶部是一个巨大的60英尺镀金自由女神像。(该消息人士表示,雕塑家尚未选定)。该消息人士称,曾考虑过较小的版本——165英尺和123英尺高的拱门,以及40英尺和30英尺高的雕塑——但特朗普“坚决要建造这个巨大的拱门”。
按目前的规模,这座拱门将约为华盛顿纪念碑(高555英尺)的一半大小,是99英尺高的林肯纪念堂的两倍多。它将成为世界上最大的纪念性拱门,比墨西哥城的革命纪念碑高约30英尺。
拟议的石拱门最新效果图上有柱子、鹰、花环和镀金的自由女神像。
“这座拱门将成为不仅在华盛顿特区,而且在全世界最具标志性的地标之一,”白宫发言人戴维斯·英格尔告诉CNN。
据一位白宫官员称,该设计正在“完善”中,并将提交给两个关键委员会——国家首都规划委员会和艺术委员会进行审批。这两个机构都是特朗普安插了忠诚者的。但与他庞大的宴会厅项目不同,拱门不在白宫场地内,因此不能免受历史保护审查。
“这完全太大了”
这座纪念碑将坐落在阿灵顿纪念大桥底部的一个交通环岛顶部,位于阿灵顿国家公墓和林肯纪念堂之间。从技术上讲,该地点位于华盛顿特区范围内。但这一位置将极大地遮挡林肯纪念堂和阿灵顿屋之间的视线——阿灵顿屋曾是南方邦联领袖罗伯特·E·李的住所,现在是阿灵顿国家公墓的核心部分。
这一景观具有特殊的历史意义。根据阿灵顿国家公墓的[网站],1861年5月弗吉尼亚州脱离联邦后,李家族于当月离开山顶住宅,美国陆军开始将其用作营地,并最终用于军事安葬,部分原因是为了阻止李家族返回。
今天,这座房子和林肯纪念堂之间通过波托马克河上的桥梁连接的空间,“是一种有意识的努力,将这些事物联系起来”,建筑历史学家兼历史保护主义者布莱恩·克拉克·格林说。
格林曾在拜登政府担任国家首都规划委员会成员,他并不反对在这个地点建造纪念碑,但他认为该项目的规模会阻碍视线。
“如果规模和尺寸适当,在这个地点建造纪念碑的想法可能会非常有吸引力,”他说。“我认为这完全太大了。它将绝对主导这个地点,主导周围的纪念碑。”
白宫没有回应CNN关于拱门可能对阿灵顿国家公墓造成影响的置评请求。
空中安全问题
对该项目的担忧还包括空中安全。
美国联邦航空管理局(FAA)要求开发商在建造任何高于地面200英尺的建筑物前至少45天提交通知,对于位于机场或导航设施附近的较低建筑也同样要求。虽然FAA不颁发建筑许可证,但地方政府通常会在批准项目前考虑该机构对建筑物安全影响的评估。
CNN对公开的障碍物记录进行的审查显示,距离里根国家机场三英里范围内的空域已经布满了障碍物。过去一年中,FAA评估了数百个结构,包括高达336英尺的起重机和320英尺以上的建筑物。
2025年10月15日,在白宫东厅的晚宴上展示了拱门计划的示意图。
吉姆·洛·斯卡尔佐/EPA/Bloomberg/Getty Images
特朗普提议的拱门将仅距离从北部飞抵机场的航班使用的走廊几英尺远。CNN对机场最终进近路径的审查显示,拱门的拟议位置处于飞机低空飞行(仅492英尺)的区域,这在该国最繁忙的空域之一,增加了飞行员失误的风险。
CNN联系了美国联邦航空管理局,该局将问题转交给了白宫。白宫未回应CNN关于空中安全的置评请求。
下一步及潜在障碍
特朗普可能会通过他安插了盟友的这两个华盛顿特区机构批准拱门计划,但该项目可能面临其他需要公众意见的更具挑战性的审查,包括《国家环境政策法》和《国家历史保护法》下的审查。
作为这些审查的一部分,利益相关者预计将被咨询,包括阿灵顿国家公墓、国家公园管理局和华盛顿特区州历史保护办公室等。
而且,该项目几乎肯定会引发法律挑战,这可能会减缓项目进展——部分原因是反对者可能认为这是挑战一个不总是遵守程序规范的政府的唯一选择。
“几乎没有理由相信这些限制会被尊重,”专门研究历史保护的律师格雷格·韦尔海瑟说,他正在就总统计划粉刷艾森豪威尔行政办公楼提起诉讼。
“这使得诉讼成为最后的保障,这给联邦法院带来了巨大压力——即使这样,问题还是法院的合法命令是否会被遵守,”他补充道。
CNN联系了正在参与特朗普宴会厅诉讼的国家历史保护信托基金,以征求其对拱门计划的评论。上个月,联邦法官对白宫在未经国会明确授权的情况下建造宴会厅的法律权威表示怀疑。
韦尔海瑟表示,关于拱门的关键法律问题是总统和他选定的委员会是否遵循了必要的流程。
“这不是关于拱门是好是坏。而是关于一座250英尺高的、将使林肯纪念堂相形见绌并遮挡阿灵顿国家公墓标志性景观的建筑是否会损害历史资源,以及是否应该在其他地方建造。……总统是否会遵守赋予公众在这些决策中发言权的法律?”他问道。
CNN的皮特·芒特恩对此报道有贡献。
唐纳德·特朗普
Facebook 推文[电子邮件]链接
链接已复制!
广告反馈
订阅
登录
我的账户
- [设置]
- [新闻通讯]
- [您关注的主题]
- [退出登录]
您的CNN账户 登录
[登录页面]
*
[收听][观看]
*
- [美国]
- [犯罪与司法]
- [世界]
- [非洲]
- [美洲]
- [亚洲]
- [澳大利亚]
- [中国]
- [欧洲]
- [印度]
- [中东]
- [英国]
- [政治]
- [特朗普]
- [事实核查]
- [CNN民调]
- [2026选举日历]
- [重新划分选区跟踪]
- [商业]
- [科技]
- [媒体]
- [计算器]
- [视频]
- [市场]
- [盘前交易]
- [盘后交易]
- [恐惧与贪婪]
- [投资]
- [市场动态]
- [夜报]
- [健康]
- [生活,更美好]
- [健身]
- [饮食]
- [睡眠]
- [正念]
- [人际关系]
- [CNN Underscored]
- [电子产品]
- [时尚]
- [美容]
- [健康与健身]
- [家居]
- [评论]
- [优惠]
- [礼物]
- [旅行]
- [户外]
- [宠物]
- [娱乐]
- [电影]
- [电视]
- [名人]
- [科技]
- [创新]
- [可预见的未来]
- [使命:前沿]
- [工作变革]
- [创新城市]
- [风格]
- [艺术]
- [设计]
- [时尚]
- [建筑]
- [奢侈品]
- [美容]
- [视频]
- [旅行]
- [目的地]
- [美食与饮品]
- [住宿]
- [新闻]
- [视频]
- [体育]
- [职业橄榄球]
- [大学橄榄球]
- [篮球]
- [棒球]
- [足球]
- [奥运会]
- [曲棍球]
- [科学]
- [太空]
- [生命]
- [发掘]
- [气候]
- [解决方案]
- [天气]
- [天气]
- [视频]
- [气候]
- [2026年冬季奥运会]
- [乌克兰-俄罗斯战争]
- [以色列-哈马斯战争]
- [观看]
- [精选内容]
- [节目与电影]
- [有线电视]
- [片段]
- [CNN头条]
- [CNN短片]
- [节目列表]
- [CNN10]
- [CNN电视节目表]
- [收听]
- [CNN五件事]
- [追命生活:桑贾伊·古普塔博士]
- [任务:奥迪·科尼什]
- [一件事]
- [拔河]
- [CNN政治简报]
- [斧头档案]
- [安德森·库珀全部]
- [CNN所有音频播客]
- [游戏]
- [每日填字游戏]
- [字谜游戏]
- [照片洗牌]
- [Sudoblock]
- [数独]
- [五件事测验]
- [总统日促销]
- [关于CNN]
- [订阅]
- [照片]
- [调查]
- [CNN简介]
- [CNN领导层]
- [CNN新闻通讯]
- [为CNN工作]
*
[](https://www.cnn.com/account/log-in)
Trump forges ahead with plans for 250-foot arch despite concerns on the ground and in the air
2026-02-10T11:00:47.631Z / CNN
[Betsy Klein], Ian Berry, [Renée Rigdon]
2 hr ago
PUBLISHED Feb 10, 2026, 6:00 AM ET
Donald Trump
Facebook Tweet[Email]Link
Link Copied!
President Donald Trump holds models of an arch as he delivers remarks during a ballroom fundraising dinner in the East Room of the White House on October 15, 2025.
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
[President Donald Trump] wants to build an arch, and he wants it to be the biggest in the world. But even as he suggests he’ll sign an executive order for its construction, the project is facing pushback and will likely hit legal hurdles before it can proceed.
Trump wants an American version of Paris’ L’Arc de Triomphe, but bigger — the [Independence Arch] would be 250 feet tall to commemorate the nation’s 250th anniversary. (L’Arc de Triomphe is 164 feet tall). Based on standard measurements, that would be the equivalent of a 16- to 20-story building.
It’s just Trump’s latest — and tallest — effort to impose his style and tastes on the nation’s capital, and he’s been extremely hands-on. But preservationists are warning that the proposed structure — which would be situated across the Potomac River from the Lincoln Memorial — will block historically significant views in either direction and could pose a hazard to air travel at nearby Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.
Ad Feedback
The structure of the proposed arch would be 165-feet tall and 165-feet wide, with a 25-foot pedestal and a massive 60-foot gilt bronze Lady Liberty sculpture on top, according to a source familiar with the plans who was granted anonymity to speak freely without professional repercussions. (A sculptor has yet to be selected for that part of the project, that source said.) Smaller versions — 165- and 123-foot-tall iterations with 40- and 30-foot-tall sculptures — were considered, the source said, but Trump is “dead-set on building this huge arch.”
At its current scope, the arch will be roughly half the size of the Washington Monument, which is 555 feet tall, and more than double the size of the 99-foot Lincoln Memorial. And it would be the largest monumental arch in the world, about 30 feet taller than Mexico City’s Monumento a la Revolucion.
The most recent [renderings] of the proposed stone arch feature columns, eagles, wreaths and the gilded Lady Liberty.
“The Arch is going to be one of the most iconic landmarks not only in Washington, D.C., but throughout the world,” White House spokesman Davis Ingle told CNN.
The design is being “refined,” according to a White House official, and will be presented for approval to a pair of key commissions, the National Capital Planning Commission and the Commission on Fine Arts — two bodies Trump has stacked with loyalists. But unlike his sprawling ballroom project, the arch is not on White House grounds and therefore is not exempt from historic preservation review.
‘This is entirely too big’
The monument would sit atop a traffic circle at the base of the Arlington Memorial Bridge, directly between Arlington National Cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial. The site is technically within Washington, DC, limits. But that placement will drastically block the view between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington House, once home to Confederate leader Robert E. Lee and now a centerpiece of Arlington National Cemetery.
That view has special historical significance. After the Lee family abandoned the hilltop house in May 1861 in the wake of Virginia’s secession from the Union, the US Army began using it as a camp and eventually for military burials, in part as a deterrence for the Lee family’s return, according to Arlington National Cemetery’s [website].
Today, the space between the house and the Lincoln Memorial — which is connected by the bridge across the Potomac — “is a very conscious effort linking these things,” said Bryan Clark Green, an architectural historian and historic preservationist.
Green, who served as a Joe Biden appointee on the National Capital Planning Commission, isn’t opposed to a monument on this site, but argued that the scale of the project would obstruct the line of sight.
“The idea of doing a monument in this site could be really compelling if it were scaled properly and sized properly,” he said. “I think this is entirely too big. It’s just going to absolutely dominate the site, dominate the monuments around it.”
The White House did not respond to CNN’s inquiry about the arch’s potential impact on Arlington National Cemetery.
Air safety concerns
Concerns about the project extend to safety in the air.
The Federal Aviation Administration requires developers to file notice at least 45 days before construction for any structure taller than 200 feet above ground level, and for lower structures located near airports or navigation facilities. And while the FAA does not issue building permits, local governments typically weigh the agency’s findings about a structure’s safety impact before approving projects.
A CNN review of publicly available obstacle records shows the airspace within three miles of Reagan National Airport is already dense with obstructions. Over the past year, the FAA has evaluated hundreds of structures, including cranes up to 336 feet and buildings above 320 feet, in that area.
Diagrams of the planned arch are seen during a dinner in the East Room of the White House on October 15, 2025.
Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA/Bloomberg/Getty Images
Trump’s proposed arch would sit only feet from the corridor used for flights approaching the airport from the north. A CNN review of the final approach path into the airport shows the arch’s proposed location would be at a point where aircraft pass at a low altitude of only 492 feet, raising concerns about a narrow margin for pilot error in one of the nation’s tightest sections of airspace.
CNN reached out to the Federal Aviation Administration, which referred questions to the White House. The White House did not respond to CNN’s inquiries about air safety.
Next steps and potential hurdles
It’s likely that plans for the arch will be approved by the two DC-based bodies Trump has packed with allies, but the arch may face other more challenging reviews that require public input, including under the National Environmental Policy Act and the National Historic Preservation Act.
As part of those reviews, stakeholders are expected to be consulted, including Arlington National Cemetery, the National Park Service and the DC State Historic Preservation Office, among others.
And the project is almost certain to draw legal challenges that could slow it down — in part because opponents may see that as their only option to challenge an administration that doesn’t always abide by procedural norms.
“There is little reason to believe those limits would be respected,” said Greg Werkheiser, a lawyer specializing in historic preservation who is [suing the Trump administration] over the president’s plans to paint the Eisenhower Executive Office Building.
“That leaves litigation as the last safeguard, placing extraordinary weight on the federal courts – and even then, the question becomes whether lawful court orders will be followed,” he added.
A model of an arch is seen on the Resolute Desk in the Oval Office of the White House on October 15, 2025.
Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA/Bloomberg/Getty Images
CNN has reached out to the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which is currently embroiled in the lawsuit over Trump’s ballroom, for comment on the arch plans. A federal judge [expressed skepticism] last month that the White House has legal authority to construct the ballroom without express authorization of Congress.
The key legal question for the arch, Werkheiser said, is whether the president and the committee he selects follow the required process.
“This isn’t about whether an arch is good or bad. It’s about whether a 250-foot structure that would dwarf the Lincoln Memorial and block iconic views of Arlington National Cemetery would harm historic resources and should be sited elsewhere. … Will the president follow the laws that give the public a voice in these decisions?” he asked.
CNN’s Pete Muntean contributed to this report.
Donald Trump
Facebook Tweet[Email]Link
Link Copied!
Ad Feedback
Subscribe
Sign in
My Account
- [Settings]
- [Newsletters]
- [Topics you follow]
- [Sign out]
Your CNN account Sign in to your CNN account
[](https://www.cnn.com/account/log-in)
*
[Listen][Watch]
*
- [US]
- [Crime & Justice]
- [World]
- [Africa]
- [Americas]
- [Asia]
- [Australia]
- [China]
- [Europe]
- [India]
- [Middle East]
- [United Kingdom]
- [Politics]
- [Trump]
- [Facts First]
- [CNN Polls]
- [2026 Elections Calendar]
- [Redistricting Tracker]
- [Business]
- [Tech]
- [Media]
- [Calculators]
- [Videos]
- [Markets]
- [Pre-markets]
- [After-Hours]
- [Fear & Greed]
- [Investing]
- [Markets Now]
- [Nightcap]
- [Health]
- [Life, But Better]
- [Fitness]
- [Food]
- [Sleep]
- [Mindfulness]
- [Relationships]
- [CNN Underscored]
- [Electronics]
- [Fashion]
- [Beauty]
- [Health & Fitness]
- [Home]
- [Reviews]
- [Deals]
- [Gifts]
- [Travel]
- [Outdoors]
- [Pets]
- [Entertainment]
- [Movies]
- [Television]
- [Celebrity]
- [Tech]
- [Innovate]
- [Foreseeable Future]
- [Mission: Ahead]
- [Work Transformed]
- [Innovative Cities]
- [Style]
- [Arts]
- [Design]
- [Fashion]
- [Architecture]
- [Luxury]
- [Beauty]
- [Video]
- [Travel]
- [Destinations]
- [Food & Drink]
- [Stay]
- [News]
- [Videos]
- [Sports]
- [Pro Football]
- [College Football]
- [Basketball]
- [Baseball]
- [Soccer]
- [Olympics]
- [Hockey]
- [Science]
- [Space]
- [Life]
- [Unearthed]
- [Climate]
- [Solutions]
- [Weather]
- [Weather]
- [Video]
- [Climate]
- [Winter Olympics 2026]
- [Ukraine-Russia War]
- [Israel-Hamas War]
- [Watch]
- [Featured]
- [Shows & Films]
- [Network TV]
- [Clips]
- [CNN Headlines]
- [CNN Shorts]
- [Shows A-Z]
- [CNN10]
- [CNN TV Schedules]
- [Listen]
- [CNN 5 Things]
- [Chasing Life with Dr. Sanjay Gupta]
- [The Assignment with Audie Cornish]
- [One Thing]
- [Tug of War]
- [CNN Political Briefing]
- [The Axe Files]
- [All There Is with Anderson Cooper]
- [All CNN Audio podcasts]
- [Games]
- [Daily Crossword]
- [Jumble Crossword]
- [Photo Shuffle]
- [Sudoblock]
- [Sudoku]
- [5 Things Quiz]
- [Presidents’ Day Sales]
- [About CNN]
- [Subscribe]
- [Photos]
- [Investigations]
- [CNN Profiles]
- [CNN Leadership]
- [CNN Newsletters]
- [Work for CNN]
*
[](https://www.cnn.com/
发表回复