发布时间：2026年2月5日，美国东部时间凌晨5:00 / 来源：CNN
作者：[肖恩·林加尔斯]
17分钟前
标签：图尔西·加巴德、国家安全、唐纳德·特朗普、联邦机构
[Facebook 推文][电子邮件][链接]
链接已复制！
国家情报总监图尔西·加巴德于2025年7月23日在白宫新闻发布会上
（肯特·西村/路透社/资料图片）
上周，国家情报总监图尔西·加巴德出现在联邦调查局（FBI）对佐治亚州一个选举办公室的搜查现场后，遭到部分选举官员的强烈批评。加巴德在周一给民主党议员的一封信中，以一系列情报法和政策为由为自己的行为进行了辩护。
“我的到场是应总统要求，并依据我广泛的法定权力进行的，我负责协调、整合和分析与选举安全相关的情报，包括反间谍（CI）、外国及其他恶意影响和网络安全，”加巴德在信中写道。一名白宫官员证实，总统唐纳德·特朗普要求加巴德前往亚特兰大参与此次搜查。
然而，几位前高级情报官员和选举法专家告诉CNN，加巴德对此次FBI搜查没有合法管辖权，她出现在联邦探员搜查2020年选举选票的富尔顿县，可能会侵蚀水门事件后建立的外国与国内情报活动之间的关键界限。
“如果你让人们相信情报界在国内搞政治游戏，那后果很严重，”一位前高级反间谍官员表示，“我不希望重蹈‘教会委员会’揭露的那些滥用职权的覆辙。”
这一说法指的是20世纪70年代中期美国参议院对联邦调查局、中央情报局和国家安全局侵犯公民自由的调查，该调查促使新法律出台以约束间谍机构。
FBI探员于1月28日在亚特兰大郊外的富尔顿县执行搜查令，查获了2020年选举使用的选票。
佐治亚州长期以来是特朗普虚假宣称2020年选举被操纵的核心焦点——这一说法已被众多法院裁决和审计报告推翻。
除了加巴德在佐治亚州的行动外，她的办公室此前还曾接触波多黎各使用的投票机，以调查其安全漏洞，其发言人周三晚间向CNN证实了这一点。
一名FBI雇员站在富尔顿县选举中心内，当时FBI正在搜查2020年选举选票，2026年1月28日摄于佐治亚州尤宁市，靠近亚特兰大。（迈克·斯图尔特/美联社）
（迈克·斯图尔特/美联社）
“在她的信中，加巴德‘援引了一系列与外国势力活动相关的授权，但实际上并未将这些授权与任何具体指控联系起来，甚至表示她从未见过搜查令或其依据的证据’，”这位前反间谍官员表示，与其他消息人士一样，他因害怕遭到特朗普政府的报复而要求匿名。“那么，她到底在那里做什么？除非这是一场政治作秀，否则这毫无意义。”
加巴德称，她办公室的总法律顾问认为她的行动符合其合法权限，且特朗普已责成她的办公室“根据我的法定权力采取一切适当行动，确保我们选举的完整性”。
国家情报总监负责监督情报界的17个其他机构；但该职位本身不具备执法机构的调查权，也没有其他间谍机构在实地采取秘密行动的“操作权”。因此，加巴德出现在执法行动现场的行为，令那些在情报和选举领域工作数十年的人士感到困惑。
“尽管她在信中做了各种描述，但这位政治任命的国家情报总监绝对没有权力或理由出现在县选举办公室的搜查令执行现场，”无党派非营利组织“选举创新与研究中心”的执行董事、选举法专家大卫·贝克尔表示。
“如果拜登的国家情报总监在FBI搜查海湖庄园（注：特朗普私邸）的机密文件时在场，你能想象特朗普的辩护律师会有什么反应吗？而现在那位辩护律师已是副司法部长了。”贝克尔补充道。
周二，白宫为加巴德的到场辩护。新闻秘书卡罗琳·利维特表示，特朗普“指派”加巴德“监督美国选举的神圣性和安全性”，并“直接与FBI局长合作”。
“我认为总统指派内阁成员处理大多数人希望解决的问题，这没有任何问题，”她说。
但一位前高级情报界律师向CNN指出：“加巴德的‘授权仅限于协调对选举中潜在外国干预的审查，这并不赋予她操作权，更不能延伸至查看选举选票’。”
参议院情报委员会的高级民主党议员马克·华纳已要求加巴德在宣誓后向委员会作证，说明她在富尔顿县的行为。而该委员会主席、共和党议员汤姆·科顿周二被CNN问及对加巴德在富尔顿县行动的看法时，仅简单回应“不（合时宜）”。
曾协助领导参议院情报委员会两党调查俄罗斯干预2016年美国总统大选的艾米丽·哈丁表示，议员们可以向加巴德提出一些有揭示性的问题。
“我想询问加巴德，是什么外国证据为搜查令提供了依据，以及这些证据是如何传达给富尔顿县的，”现任职于战略与国际研究中心（CSIS）的哈丁说道。
“首先，国家情报总监参与必须有外国关联，”她补充道，“如果存在这种关联，那就构成了FBI的反间谍案件，这是该局最敏感的工作之一。除非有确凿证据，否则他们不会向任何人透露调查内容。”
这位前政府律师还指出，在评估俄罗斯2016年选举干预活动时，美国情报机构并未就莫斯科的行为是否影响选举结果表态，因为干涉选民偏好超出了间谍机构的权限范围。
2019年，时任国家情报总监丹·科茨任命了一名“选举威胁主管”，即一名高级情报官员，专门负责关注外国对选举的威胁。一位前高级情报官员表示，官员们谨慎地将这一角色定位为分析威胁，而非直接参与选举基础设施的工作。
“国家情报总监办公室的职责是向国内官员通报外国威胁，而非确保选举安全——这是州和地方官员的职责，”这位前情报官员表示，“情报界不应该介入国内选举事务。”
加巴德在特朗普政府初期经历波折后，通过追随其虚假选举舞弊指控，巩固了自己在政府内部和总统心中的地位。
有报道称，她与中央情报局局长约翰·拉特克利夫关系紧张，而她为自己开辟了这条特定的道路。消息人士告诉CNN，拉特克利夫不想参与寻找选举舞弊的工作。
消息人士称，加巴德被赋予“选举完整性”任务，另有一个目的是让她与拉特克利夫划清界限。
作为特朗普第一任期的国家情报总监，拉特克利夫曾在镜头前宣布伊朗和俄罗斯特工正在干预2020年选举。然而，据CNN报道，在特朗普第二任期内，由于政府削减了打击外国影响选举的项目，此类宣布变得不太可能。
CNN的扎卡里·科恩和克里斯汀·霍尔姆斯提供了补充报道。
图尔西·加巴德 国家安全 唐纳德·特朗普 联邦机构
[Facebook 推文][电子邮件][链接]
链接已复制！
广告反馈
What does Tulsi Gabbard’s job as director of national intelligence have to do with elections? | CNN Politics
Published Feb 5, 2026, 5:00 AM ET / Source: CNN
By
[Sean Lyngaas]
17 min ago
Tulsi Gabbard National security Donald Trump Federal agencies
Facebook Tweet[Email]Link
Link Copied!
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard at a White House a press briefing on July 23, 2025.
Kent Nishimura/Reuters/File
After intense criticism from some election officials after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was present during an FBI search of an elections office in Georgia last week, Gabbard defended her actions by pointing to a slew of intelligence laws and policies.
“My presence was requested by the President and executed under my broad statutory authority to coordinate, integrate, and analyze intelligence related to election security, including counterintelligence (CI), foreign and other malign influence and cybersecurity,” Gabbard wrote in a letter to Democratic lawmakers on Monday. A White House official confirmed President Donald Trump asked Gabbard to go to Atlanta for the search.
But several former senior intelligence officials and election law experts told CNN that Gabbard has no legal authority over such an FBI search and that her presence in Fulton County, where federal agents took ballots from the 2020 election, risks eroding a crucial line between foreign and domestic intelligence activities instituted after Watergate.
Ad Feedback
“If you convince people that the intelligence community is playing political games domestically, it’s bad,” said one former senior counterintelligence official. “I don’t think anyone wants a reprise of the kind of stuff the Church Committee uncovered.”
That’s a reference to the mid-1970s Senate investigation into civil liberties abuses by the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency that led to new laws reining in the spy agencies.
FBI agents on January 28 executed a search warrant in Fulton County, outside of Atlanta, and seized ballots used in the 2020 election.
Georgia has long been central to Trump’s false claim that the 2020 election was rigged — a claim debunked by numerous court decisions and audits.
In addition to Gabbard’s presence in Georgia, her office had previously gained access to voting machines used in Puerto Rico to probe them for security vulnerabilities, a spokesperson confirmed to CNN on Wednesday night.
An FBI employee stands inside the Fulton County Election HUB as the FBI takes Fulton County 2020 Election ballots, Wednesday, Jan. 28, 2026, in Union City, Ga., near Atlanta. (AP Photo/Mike Stewart)
Mike Stewart/AP
In her letter, Gabbard “cites a bunch of authorities related to the activities of foreign actors, doesn’t actually tie them to any specific allegation and even says she hasn’t seen the warrant or the evidence it’s based on,” said the former counterintelligence official, who like others, spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation from the Trump administration. “So, what the hell is she doing there? It’s nonsensical unless it’s political.”
Gabbard said her office’s general counsel found her actions to be within her lawful authority, and that Trump had tasked her officewith “taking all appropriate actions under my statutory authorities towards ensuring the integrity of our elections.”
The director of national intelligence oversees the intelligence community’s 17 other organizations; the director does not have the investigative authorities of law enforcement or the “operational” ones that other spy agencies have to take covert action in the field. Gabbard’s presence during a law enforcement operation is therefore baffling people who spent decades in intelligence and in elections.
“Despite the characterizations in her letter, the politically-appointed DNI has absolutely no authority or reason to be present during the execution of a warrant on a county election office,” said David Becker, an election law expert who is executive director of the nonprofit and nonpartisan Center for Election Innovation and Research.
“Can you imagine the uproar from Trump’s defense attorney if Biden’s DNI had been present at Mar-a-Lago during the execution of the warrant on his classified files? That defense attorney is now the Deputy Attorney General,” Becker said.
The White House on Tuesday defended Gabbard’s presence at the search. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump had “tapped” Gabbard “to oversee the sanctity and the security of our American elections” and that she’s “working directly alongside the FBI director.”
“I don’t see anything wrong with the president tasking a Cabinet member to pursue an issue that most people want to see solved,” she said.
But Gabbard’s “authority extends to coordinating review of potential foreign interference in elections. That doesn’t give her operational authority, and that doesn’t extend to looking at election ballots,” a former senior intelligence community lawyer told CNN.
Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the intelligence committee, has called on Gabbard to testify before the committee under oath about her presence in Fulton County. The committee’s chairman, Republican Sen. Tom Cotton, simply said “no” when asked by CNN on Tuesday for his reaction to Gabbard’s activities in Fulton County.
Emily Harding, who helped lead the Senate intelligence committee’s bipartisan investigation into Russia’s efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election, said lawmakers could ask some revealing questions of Gabbard.
“I’d want to ask Gabbard what foreign evidence informed the search warrant and how that was communicated to Fulton County,” said Harding, who is now a vice president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
People cast their votes at the Metropolitan Library voting location in Atlanta, Georgia on Election Day, November 3, 2020.
Melina Mara/The Washington Post/Getty Images/File
“First, there has to be a foreign nexus for the DNI to be involved,” she added. “If there is, that makes it an FBI [counterintelligence] case, which are among the most sensitive things the Bureau does. They don’t tell anyone what’s going on with those unless they have real hard evidence.”
In their assessment of Russia’s 2016 election influence campaign, US intelligence agencies did not weigh in on whether Moscow’s activities impacted the vote because getting involved in voter preferences is beyond spy agencies’ authorities, the ex-government lawyer added.
Then-Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats in 2019 named an “election threats executive,” a top intelligence official to focus on foreign threats to elections. One former senior intelligence official said officials were careful to focus that role on analyzing threats rather than having any hands-on role in election infrastructure.
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s “job is to inform domestic officials about foreign threats not to ensure that elections are secure, which is the job of state and local officials,” the ex-intelligence official said. “The IC [intelligence community] shouldn’t be looking at domestic elections.”
Gabbard’s role pursuing Trump’s false election fraud arguments has boosted her standing within the administration and with the president after a rocky start.
She carved out that particular lane for herself, as it has been widely reported that she and John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, have had a fraught relationship. Ratcliffe has wanted no part in the elusive hunt for election fraud, sources familiar with the matter told CNN.
Gabbard’s tasking with “election integrity” serves the added purpose of keeping her clear of Ratcliffe, the sources said.
As the director of national intelligence in the first Trump administration, Ratcliffe stood in front of the cameras to announce that Iranian and Russian operatives were meddling in the 2020 election. In the second Trump administration, that kind of announcement is less likely after the administration made cuts to programs to combat foreign influence on elections, CNN has reported.
CNN’s Zachary Cohen and Kristen Holmes contributed reporting.
Tulsi Gabbard National security Donald Trump Federal agencies
Facebook Tweet[Email]Link
Link Copied!
Ad Feedback
发表回复