更新于2026年1月21日上午8:40（美国东部时间）/ 发布于2026年1月20日下午6:08（美国东部时间）/ 美国有线电视新闻网
[詹妮弗·汉斯拉][凯莉·阿特伍德]
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/gettyimages-2257270824.jpg
唐纳德·特朗普总统在周二的新闻发布会上回答媒体提问。
Win McNamee/Getty Images
唐纳德·特朗普总统周二暗示其”和平委员会”可能”取代”联合国，这一表态可能加剧人们对该机构的担忧——该委员会本应负责监督加沙重建，且特朗普将无限期担任主席——相反，它可能成为特朗普试图取代80年前成立的维护全球和平机构的工具。
在特朗普发表上述言论之前，一些外交官已经对该委员会的潜在成员构成、以及”永久席位售价10亿美元”的事实存在诸多担忧。与此同时，特朗普正前往瑞士达沃斯参加世界经济论坛，且因坚持美国应拥有格陵兰岛而面临北约成员国日益增长的愤怒。
白宫周五宣布成立”创始执行委员会”，成员包括特朗普的女婿贾里德·库什纳、国务卿马尔科·卢比奥、特别代表史蒂夫·维特科夫和前英国首相托尼·布莱尔。
根据CNN获取的一份章程草案，特朗普将无限期担任该委员会主席，任期可能超过他的第二个总统任期。只有通过”自愿辞职或因无行为能力，经执行委员会一致投票决定”，特朗普才会被替换。一位美国官员表示，未来的美国总统除特朗普外，还可任命或指定美国代表加入该委员会。
消息人士称，特朗普近日已向数十个国家发出邀请，预计本周在达沃斯主持签约仪式。
关于哪些国家实际会加入该委员会，目前仍存疑问。尽管阿联酋和巴林等国已确认参与，但其他国家尚未承诺——其中一些国家，如法国，已明确拒绝。
俄罗斯和中国受邀加入
俄罗斯是受邀加入的国家之一——这引发了对一个积极参战的国家如何参与和平进程的担忧。中国和白俄罗斯也收到了邀请。
“普京肯定会利用俄罗斯在和平委员会的成员身份来破坏联合国，并进一步分裂美国的盟友体系，”美国前副联合国大使罗伯特·伍德表示。
英国外交大臣伊维特·库珀周二表示：”普京不是和平人士，我认为他不应该加入任何以’和平’为名的组织。”
周三，以色列总理本杰明·内塔尼亚胡宣布接受特朗普的邀请加入该委员会，尽管他对执行委员会中包含土耳其和卡塔尔官员参与20点加沙停火计划的实施表示强烈不满。
一些官员对该委员会宽泛的章程可能试图取代联合国工作表示严重关切——特朗普一直抨击联合国。随邀请一同发送的章程草案甚至未提及加沙。
章程将和平委员会描述为”一个旨在促进稳定、恢复可靠合法治理、并在受冲突影响或威胁的地区确保持久和平的国际组织”。
周二，特朗普似乎确认了这一意图，他抨击联合国称：”联合国一直不太有帮助。我对联合国的潜力很感兴趣，但它从未发挥其潜力。”
特朗普在白宫新闻发布会上对记者表示：”联合国本应解决我所解决的每一场战争。我从未求助于他们，甚至没想过要去。”
盟友表达担忧
法国拒绝加入该委员会，理由是担心它会形成一个与联合国并行的独立体系。
法国外交部发言人帕斯卡尔·孔法夫雷告诉CNN：”当你阅读该章程时，会发现它不仅仅适用于加沙，而我们在联合国安理会通过的决议确实针对加沙和中东问题。第二点是，这引发了关于联合国宪章合理性的严重关切。”
爱尔兰外交部长海伦·麦克恩蒂表示，该国将”仔细考虑”这一邀请，但指出特朗普提出的机构”授权范围将超出加沙和平计划的实施”。
她在一份声明中说：”联合国在维护国际和平与安全方面拥有独特的授权，并有合法性将各国团结起来解决共同挑战。尽管它可能不完美，但联合国和国际法的首要地位现在比以往任何时候都更为重要。”
周二，联合国人道主义事务负责人汤姆·弗莱彻表示，特朗普的和平委员会不会取代联合国组织。
美国前中东谈判代表亚伦·大卫·米勒对和平委员会取代联合国工作的能力表示怀疑。
他告诉CNN：”整个事情就像远在另一个星系，而非地球上的现实问题。”
“我不明白如何将其工具化，”他说，”冲突的解决不是靠外部组织，而是靠调解人与对抗和冲突中的双方合作。”
米勒指出，尽管联合国存在”缺陷和功能失调，但你如何取代或与一个自1946年成立以来的组织竞争呢？该组织拥有安理会五个常任理事国，几十年来在人道主义工作和维和行动中发挥了巨大作用。”
“你无法与这个组织抗衡，”他说，”它规模太大，历史太悠久，且与国际格局的诸多方面紧密相连。”
伍德指出，任何试图让和平委员会取代联合国的举动”肯定会遭到大多数联合国成员国的反对”。
“和平委员会是否能作为冲突解决机制拥有未来，取决于它在加沙能取得什么成果，”他告诉CNN。
10亿美元购买永久席位
委员会成员任期为三年。如果希望获得永久席位，需缴纳10亿美元的高额费用。一位美国官员表示，这10亿美元承诺并非”入门费”，各国无需承担强制性的资金义务。该官员称，那些”对项目作出重大贡献并希望获得适当监督的国家可以继续参与”。
“并非所有有能力支付10亿美元的国家都适合在国际舞台上监督和平与安全，”伍德说。
一些外交官表示，高额费用是其国家需要研究的问题。
“我们希望加入，但必须研究，因为这需要相当大的财政投入，”一位受邀加入的国家大使表示，”这需要我们经济团队和预算部门进行大量研究。”
一位美国官员声称，这些资金将用于加沙重建。熟悉讨论的两位消息人士表示，美国官员已与承包公司就重建工作进行初步讨论，但尚未敲定或甚至勾勒出任何计划。
米勒将这一费用比作加入特朗普的海湖庄园俱乐部。
“我无法想象任何有民主程序的人会加入这个组织，并克服将自身参与权让渡给特朗普否决权的法律和政治障碍，更不用说为三年以上的成员资格支付10亿美元了，”他说。
然而，据一位熟悉讨论的消息人士透露，一些未受邀加入的国家私下表达了参与兴趣，甚至考虑支付10亿美元的高额费用以加入该委员会。
CNN记者凯文·利普塔克和伊万娜·科塔索娃提供报道。
Trump says Board of Peace established to oversee reconstruction of Gaza ‘might’ replace the United Nations
Updated Jan 21, 2026, 8:40 AM ET / Published Jan 20, 2026, 6:08 PM ET / CNN
[Jennifer Hansler][Kylie Atwood]
https://news-multimedia-1393112320.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/gettyimages-2257270824.jpg
President Donald Trump takes questions from the media during a press briefing on Tuesday.
Win McNamee/Getty Images
President Donald Trump’s suggestion Tuesday that his Board of Peace “might” replace the United Nations is likely to compound concerns that the body meant to oversee the reconstruction of Gaza – and that he will indefinitely chair – will instead become a vehicle for him to attempt to supersede the body established 80 years ago to maintain global peace.
Before Trump’s comments, some diplomats already had myriad concerns over the board’s possible membership, and the fact a permanent seat is up for sale at $1 billion. They come as Trump heads to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and as he faces mounting anger from NATO members over his insistence that the US should own Greenland.
The White House on Friday announced a “founding Executive Board,” including Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, special envoy Steve Witkoff and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
And according to the charter draft, a copy of which was obtained by CNN, Trump will serve as indefinite chairman of the board, which could last beyond the duration of his second term as president. Trump will be replaced only due to “voluntary resignation or as a result of incapacity, as determined by a unanimous vote of the Executive Board.” A future US president can appoint or designate the US representative to the board in addition to Trump, a US official said.
Trump has sent invitations in recent days to dozens of countries to join and is expected to host a signing ceremony in Davos this week, sources said.
Questions remain about which countries will actually join the board. Although some, such as the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, have confirmed their participation, others have yet to commit – and some, such as France, have declined.
Russia and China invited
Russia is among the nations invited to join – raising alarm about how a country actively waging war could be involved in an effort to secure peace. China and Belarus have also been invited.
“Putin would certainly use Russia’s membership on the Board of Peace to undermine the UN and, by extension, sow further divisions in America’s alliances,” said Robert Wood, a former deputy US ambassador to the UN.
“Putin is not a man of peace, and I don’t think he belongs in any organization with peace in the name,” British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said Tuesday.
On Wednesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that he had accepted Trump’s invitation to join the board, even though he has openly fumed at the inclusion of Turkish and Qatari officials on the executive board for the implementation of the 20-point Gaza ceasefire plan.
There are major concerns among some officials that the Board’s broad charter is an attempt to replace the work of the UN – an organization Trump has consistently berated. The charter draft, which was sent along with the invitations to join, does not even reference Gaza.
The charter describes the Board of Peace as “an international organization that seeks to promote stability, restore dependable and lawful governance, and secure enduring peace in areas affected or threatened by conflict.”
Trump on Tuesday seemed to confirm that intention as he took a swipe at the UN, saying his board “might” replace the international body.
“The UN just hasn’t been very helpful. I’m a big fan of the UN’s potential, but it has never lived up to its potential,” Trump told reporters during a White House press briefing. “The UN should have settled every one of the wars that I settled. I never went to them, I never even thought to go to.”
Allies voice concerns
France has declined membership on the board, citing concerns that it will create a separate system to the UN.
“When you read the charter, it doesn’t only apply to Gaza, whereas the resolution that we had voted [on] … at the Security Council of the United Nations was really targeting Gaza and the Middle East,” French Foreign Ministry spokesperson Pascal Confavreux told CNN. “Point two is that it raises very important concern regarding the rationality with the charter of the United Nations.”
Irish Foreign Minister Helen McEntee said her country would give the invitation “careful consideration,” but noted that the body proposed by Trump “would have a mandate wider than the implementation of the Gaza Peace Plan.”
“The United Nations has a unique mandate to maintain international peace and security, and the legitimacy to bring nations together to find common solutions to shared challenges. While it may be imperfect, the UN and the primacy of international law is more important now than ever,” she said in a statement.
On Tuesday, the UN’s top humanitarian official, Tom Fletcher, said Trump’s Board of Peace will not replace his organization.
Aaron David Miller, a former Middle East negotiator for the US, cast doubt on the Board of Peace’s ability to replace the work of the UN.
“The whole thing is tethered to a galaxy far, far away, not to the realities back here on planet Earth,” he told CNN.
“I just don’t see how you instrumentalize it,” he said. “Conflicts are resolved not by external organizations, but by mediators working with two parties in confrontation and conflict.”
Miller noted that even with the UN’s “flaws and dysfunction, how do you replace or compete with an organization that has been in existence since 1946, which has a Security Council with five permanent members, which has done a lot of very good humanitarian work and peacekeeping work through the decades?”
“You can’t rival this organization,” he said. “It’s too big, it’s too durable, and it’s too integral to so many different pieces of the international landscape.”
Wood noted that any attempt for the Board of Peace to replace the UN “would certainly be opposed by most UN member states.”
“Whether the (Board of Peace) has any future internationally as a conflict-resolution mechanism will depend on what it can accomplish in Gaza,” he told CNN.
$1 billion for a permanent seat
Members of the board will serve for three-year terms. If they want a permanent seat, it comes with a steep cost – a contribution of $1 billion. According to the US official, the $1 billion commitment is not an entry fee and there is no mandatory funding obligation for each country. The official said countries that “make significant contributions to projects and want to have proper oversight can stay involved.”
“Not every country that has the ability to fork out $1 billion is necessarily best-suited to oversee peace and security in the international arena,” Wood said.
Some diplomats said the steep fee was a matter their country would need to study.
“We would like to join but we have to study it because it requires a financial commitment which is a fairly high amount of us,” said one ambassador from a country invited to join on the fee for a permanent seat. “This will require a substantial study from our economy team and the budgetary process.”
A US official claimed the funds will go toward rebuilding Gaza. US officials have had early discussions with contracting companies about rebuilding efforts, but none of those plans have been finalized or even sketched out, two sources familiar with the discussions said.
Miller said the fee is akin to joining Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club.
“I can’t imagine anyone who has any semblance of a democratic process being able to join this and overcome the legal and political obstacles of surrendering your own participation to Trump’s veto, let alone shelling out a billion bucks to go beyond a three-year membership,” he said.
Still, some countries that were not invited to join are privately expressing interest in participating – and are even considering offering to pay the steep $1 billion fee to become a part of the board, according to a source familiar with those discussions.
CNN’s Kevin Liptak and Ivana Kottasová contributed reporting.
发表回复